From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 403463857005; Mon,  8 Aug 2022 17:32:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 403463857005
From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org"
 <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/29456] missing DT_HASH section in shared objects
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 17:32:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: build
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.36
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29456-131-AsNue1lBSt@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29456-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29456-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Glibc-bugs mailing list <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/glibc-bugs/>
List-Help: <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bugs>,
 <mailto:glibc-bugs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 17:32:44 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29456

--- Comment #12 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot o=
rg> ---
(In reply to Arkadiusz Hiler from comment #10)
>=20
> Shifting responsibility on downstream to maintain compatibility with
> something
> that glibc provided for years as the default and there are now users of it
> is not really feasible.
>=20

I send a message on libc-alpha to obtain some opinions from other maintaine=
rs
and developers [1].

[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141302.html

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=