From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1C8A9385C413; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:28:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1C8A9385C413
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1661329699;
	bh=CCPEtU0LNSHyrD52MiNpYHFCEdXoLJIbJOBmplmGK3g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XRM0+bNzxo6ptvWjhPjR4L4ZDoX3vud2sNcrq6qyOGm8czZE4/hWfIhv41jEa6vp8
	 HKuGcsCmKYS4lyuSccARpJP79KvQGWBAfMjsqVcta/nOsKPhj1ccxU6Dv7FEyGE94e
	 rllqD5AMvxzMQTUNOfdXXDAy4iEbRyvC1G/Wal+4=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/29456] missing DT_HASH section in shared objects
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:28:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: build
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.36
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-29456-131-CGgIGVGkn8@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29456-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29456-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29456

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
SUSE uses the linker default from GCC and configures binutils explicitely to
default to 'both'.  If glibc doesn't honor this in it's default behavior I'd
declare it broken (why should it use an explicit --hash-style not honoring =
the
systems default?)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=