From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E5A2E385702A; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 11:34:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E5A2E385702A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1662377676; bh=5FVlsT+vsffORjk2ITajqapHYxQUKMIBD98YewTbIOI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fAkPKW12h9INZGNc75MHy6wnIoqNbrb8WvDtU4QUkHgUnosEeonvWhhhaotwcwMJ9 SDD5zJoqFl8zvKzNfbjfQZZMiB4HybD0brEdb0zPwKyh/edTHN1dNJKB48rPvULrKZ RA//Rffty57QHiHDu+uHwRT+d41298yN6RWF7zPY= From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug string/29546] sigdescr_np for SIGEMT is useless Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:34:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: string X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.34 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29546 Florian Weimer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-05 CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- It looks like SIGEMT is a generally-available signal, much like SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2. Linux uses it only on MIPS for emulation purposes, I think. It ta= kes a lot of squinting to consider the (deprecated) SPARC usage a valid emulati= on trap. There do not seem to be any actual uses in the Debian corpus, so that doesn't provide guidance, either. In what context did you come across this signal, and why was the string "EM= T" not descriptive there? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=