From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3D5F0395A07E; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:43:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3D5F0395A07E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1663328615; bh=gxwKL8Vevimr+D6gFBjFwGaJslYnwvK9dOO+cinjyTo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BXjjLKAPT4BFg6o5YVOwfz06dCM3EDYKtqqbxaYEbSJR+MjWGO+jv+ZvTzfNN4SEl rigNjNaHe5MpiLYTTvakSVk6rJ8HxYbT167p73nPo+oD6jCmzu8hDqWI/fsIdiFV68 NBI91heQ1WPkw2Zx6f6rmDhYw9ugq3WcV48kHLD8= From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:43:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: build X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.35 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29575 Carlos O'Donell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-16 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #0) > The testsuite currently fails with so many failed tests on Debian unstable > on sparc64 that I assume there is some underlying issue on SPARC that nee= ds > to be addressed: Please reach out to the debian-glibc team discuss these issues. The distro = team is best placed to understand the test results of Debian's glibc given the context of the previous build results. > Full build log: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=3Dglibc&arch=3Dsparc64&ver= =3D2.35- > 0experimental3&stamp=3D1662895877&raw=3D0 There were no distribution or machine maintainers that did any testing for sparc64 in glibc 2.36: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.36#SPARC_.2864-bit.29 I'd say the sparc64 support is at risk of being removed if maintainers and developers are not testing or supporting the architecture. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=