public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-*
@ 2022-09-16  8:44 glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-09-16 11:43 ` [Bug build/29575] " carlos at redhat dot com
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-09-16  8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

            Bug ID: 29575
           Summary: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite
                    failures on sparc*-linux-*-*
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.35
               URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&a
                    rch=sparc64&ver=2.35-0experimental3&stamp=1662895877&r
                    aw=0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: build
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                CC: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org, carlos at redhat dot com,
                    jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com, matorola at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The testsuite currently fails with so many failed tests on Debian unstable on
sparc64 that I assume there is some underlying issue on SPARC that needs to be
addressed:

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                             Testsuite summary                       |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-c-default-2
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-c-default-3
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-c-lfs-2
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-c-lfs-3
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-c-nongnu-2
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-c-nongnu-3
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-cc-default-2
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-cc-default-3
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-cc-lfs-2
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-cc-lfs-3
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-cc-nongnu-2
FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-cc-nongnu-3
FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic
FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2
FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3
FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4
FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain1picstatic
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain1static
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain2picstatic
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain2static
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain4picstatic
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain4static
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain5picstatic
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain5static
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain7picstatic
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain7static
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain9picstatic
FAIL: elf/ifuncmain9static
FAIL: elf/tst-array1-static
FAIL: elf/tst-array1-static-cmp
FAIL: elf/tst-array5-static
FAIL: elf/tst-audit24a
FAIL: elf/tst-audit24b
FAIL: elf/tst-audit24c
FAIL: elf/tst-audit24d
FAIL: elf/tst-bz15311
FAIL: elf/tst-dl-iter-static
FAIL: elf/tst-dl_find_object-static
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering1
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering10
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering2
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering3
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering4
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering5
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering6
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering7
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering8
FAIL: elf/tst-dso-ordering9
FAIL: elf/tst-dst-static
FAIL: elf/tst-env-setuid
FAIL: elf/tst-env-setuid-tunables
FAIL: elf/tst-getauxval-static
FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-X
FAIL: elf/tst-linkall-static
FAIL: elf/tst-main1
FAIL: elf/tst-ptrguard1-static
FAIL: elf/tst-rtld-run-static
FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-pthread-static
FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static
FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen
FAIL: elf/tst-stackguard1-static
FAIL: elf/tst-tls-allocation-failure-static
FAIL: elf/tst-tls1-static
FAIL: elf/tst-tls1-static-non-pie
FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static
FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-extern-static
FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-static
FAIL: inet/tst-deadline
FAIL: inet/tst-idna_name_classify
FAIL: io/tst-statx
FAIL: libio/tst-cleanup-default-static
FAIL: libio/tst-cleanup-default-static-cmp
FAIL: libio/tst-cleanup-nostart-stop-gc-static
FAIL: libio/tst-cleanup-nostart-stop-gc-static-cmp
FAIL: libio/tst-cleanup-start-stop-gc-static
FAIL: libio/tst-cleanup-start-stop-gc-static-cmp
FAIL: libio/tst-popen1
FAIL: localedata/bug-setlocale1-static
FAIL: localedata/tst-langinfo-setlocale-static
FAIL: malloc/tst-interpose-static-nothread
FAIL: malloc/tst-interpose-static-thread
FAIL: math/atest-exp
FAIL: math/atest-exp2
FAIL: math/atest-sincos
FAIL: math/test-fpucw-ieee-static
FAIL: math/test-fpucw-static
FAIL: math/test-signgam-uchar-init-static
FAIL: math/test-signgam-uchar-static
FAIL: math/test-signgam-uint-init-static
FAIL: math/test-signgam-uint-static
FAIL: math/test-signgam-ullong-init-static
FAIL: math/test-signgam-ullong-static
FAIL: misc/tst-align-clone-internal
FAIL: misc/tst-clone2-internal
FAIL: misc/tst-clone3-internal
FAIL: misc/tst-empty
FAIL: misc/tst-fd_to_filename
FAIL: misc/tst-getpid1-internal
FAIL: misc/tst-misalign-clone-internal
FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel21-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel24-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel30
FAIL: nptl/tst-cond11-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-locale1
FAIL: nptl/tst-locale2
FAIL: nptl/tst-pt-popen1
FAIL: nptl/tst-pthread-gdb-attach-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-pthread_exit-nothreads-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-sem11-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-sem12-static
FAIL: nptl/tst-stackguard1-static
FAIL: nss/tst-field
FAIL: posix/tst-affinity-static
FAIL: posix/tst-posix_spawn-setsid
FAIL: resolv/tst-resolv-txnid-collision
FAIL: setjmp/tst-setjmp-static
FAIL: socket/tst-socket-timestamp
FAIL: stdio-common/test-popen
FAIL: stdio-common/tst-popen
FAIL: stdio-common/tst-popen2
FAIL: stdlib/tst-secure-getenv
FAIL: stdlib/tst-setcontext2

Full build log:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=sparc64&ver=2.35-0experimental3&stamp=1662895877&raw=0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-09-16 11:43 ` carlos at redhat dot com
  2022-09-30  8:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: carlos at redhat dot com @ 2022-09-16 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-09-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #0)
> The testsuite currently fails with so many failed tests on Debian unstable
> on sparc64 that I assume there is some underlying issue on SPARC that needs
> to be addressed:

Please reach out to the debian-glibc team discuss these issues. The distro team
is best placed to understand the test results of Debian's glibc given the
context of the previous build results.

> Full build log:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=sparc64&ver=2.35-
> 0experimental3&stamp=1662895877&raw=0

There were no distribution or machine maintainers that did any testing for
sparc64 in glibc 2.36:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.36#SPARC_.2864-bit.29

I'd say the sparc64 support is at risk of being removed if maintainers and
developers are not testing or supporting the architecture.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-09-16 11:43 ` [Bug build/29575] " carlos at redhat dot com
@ 2022-09-30  8:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-09-30  8:53 ` [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-09-30  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
The issue is alleviated by building with "--disable-default-pie".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-09-16 11:43 ` [Bug build/29575] " carlos at redhat dot com
  2022-09-30  8:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-09-30  8:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-09-30  8:54 ` [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-09-30  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[Regression 2.34/2.25]:     |[Regression 2.34/2.25]:
                   |Large number of testsuite   |Many testsuite failures
                   |failures on                 |when not building with
                   |sparc*-linux-*-*            |"--disable-default-pie" on
                   |                            |sparc*-linux-*

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-09-30  8:53 ` [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-09-30  8:54 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-10-04 17:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-09-30  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[Regression 2.34/2.25]:     |[2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite
                   |Many testsuite failures     |failures when not building
                   |when not building with      |with
                   |"--disable-default-pie" on  |"--disable-default-pie" on
                   |sparc*-linux-*              |sparc*-linux-*

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-09-30  8:54 ` [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-10-04 17:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
  2022-11-06 15:08 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2022-10-04 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

--- Comment #3 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> ---
On sparc, where static PIE is not supported but PIE is, both libc and static
binaries are built with -DPIC. It leads to wrong startup code for static
binaries. I will send a patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-04 17:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
@ 2022-11-06 15:08 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2022-11-07  6:54 ` sam at gentoo dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-11-06 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
FWIW, this issue affects sh4 as well.

Unless glibc is built with "--disable-default-pie", building a static busybox
binary on sh4 fails with the following linker errors:

(...)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(kill.o)(.text+0x3a):
unexpected instruction 0XA005 (expected 0xd0??: mov.l)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(kill.o)(.text+0x3c):
unexpected instruction 0XE0FF (expected 0x0?12: stc)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(kill.o)(.text+0x3e):
unexpected instruction 0X09 (expected 0x0?ce: mov.l)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(uname.o)(.text+0x3a):
unexpected instruction 0XA005 (expected 0xd0??: mov.l)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(uname.o)(.text+0x3c):
unexpected instruction 0XE0FF (expected 0x0?12: stc)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(uname.o)(.text+0x3e):
unexpected instruction 0X09 (expected 0x0?ce: mov.l)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(alarm.o)(.text+0x3a):
unexpected instruction 0XA005 (expected 0xd0??: mov.l)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(alarm.o)(.text+0x3c):
unexpected instruction 0XE0FF (expected 0x0?12: stc)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(alarm.o)(.text+0x3e):
unexpected instruction 0X09 (expected 0x0?ce: mov.l)
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-linux-gnu/12/../../../sh4-linux-gnu/libc.a(vfork.o)(.text+0x26):
unexpected instruction 0XA005 (expected 0xd0??: mov.l)
(...)

See:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=busybox&arch=sh4&ver=1%3A1.35.0-4&stamp=1667730661&raw=0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-06 15:08 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2022-11-07  6:54 ` sam at gentoo dot org
  2022-11-12 23:44 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sam at gentoo dot org @ 2022-11-07  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sam at gentoo dot org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-07  6:54 ` sam at gentoo dot org
@ 2022-11-12 23:44 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2023-07-19 11:48 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2023-07-19 12:46 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2022-11-12 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
Similar segfaults observed on alpha as well starting with 2.34:

> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=alpha&ver=2.34-8&stamp=1662963628&raw=0
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=alpha&ver=2.35-4&stamp=1666729919&raw=0
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=alpha&ver=2.36-4&stamp=1667607306&raw=0

However, building with "--disable-default-pie" doesn't seem to help in this
case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-12 23:44 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2023-07-19 11:48 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
  2023-07-19 12:46 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2023-07-19 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
(In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #3)
> On sparc, where static PIE is not supported but PIE is, both libc and static
> binaries are built with -DPIC. It leads to wrong startup code for static
> binaries. I will send a patch.

Wasn't this issue fixed a year ago? Can we close this bug?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-*
  2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-07-19 11:48 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2023-07-19 12:46 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org @ 2023-07-19 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29575

--- Comment #7 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #6)
> (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #3)
> > On sparc, where static PIE is not supported but PIE is, both libc and static
> > binaries are built with -DPIC. It leads to wrong startup code for static
> > binaries. I will send a patch.
> 
> Wasn't this issue fixed a year ago? Can we close this bug?

The issue is even if static-pie is disabled for sparc64, it changes some build
flags that end up using the wrong flags on the start files build. So currently
we still require --disable-default-pie.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-19 12:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-16  8:44 [Bug build/29575] New: [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Large number of testsuite failures on sparc*-linux-*-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-09-16 11:43 ` [Bug build/29575] " carlos at redhat dot com
2022-09-30  8:53 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-09-30  8:53 ` [Bug build/29575] [Regression 2.34/2.25]: Many testsuite failures when not building with "--disable-default-pie" on sparc*-linux-* glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-09-30  8:54 ` [Bug build/29575] [2.35/2.36]: " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-10-04 17:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-11-06 15:08 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-11-07  6:54 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2022-11-12 23:44 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2023-07-19 11:48 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2023-07-19 12:46 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).