public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aurelien at aurel32 dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug string/29611] Optimized AVX2 string functions unconditionally use BMI2 instructions
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 05:19:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29611-131-DYDCAyxx2O@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29611-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29611

--- Comment #5 from Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net> ---
(In reply to Noah Goldstein from comment #3)
> (In reply to Noah Goldstein from comment #2)
> > This was fixed by:
> > 
> > commit 83c5b368226c34a2f0a5287df40fc290b2b34359
> > Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> > Date:   Mon Apr 19 10:45:07 2021 -0700
> > 
> >     x86-64: Require BMI2 for strchr-avx2.S
> > 
> > Which we can probably backport easily. The issue is that some avx2 changes
> > where backported without the surrounding ifunc code.
> >
> 
> I think this needs to be backported to:
> 2.28-2.32 
> 
> I applies cleanly on 2.32
> 
> but for 2.28 - 2.31 it depends on:
> 
> commit 107e6a3c2212ba7a3a4ec7cae8d82d73f7c95d0b (HEAD)
> Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Date:   Mon Jun 29 16:36:08 2020 -0700
> 
>     x86: Support usable check for all CPU features
> 

If that one is too complicated to backport to 2.31, maybe it's easier to revert
the optimization in 2.31?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-26  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-25  8:17 [Bug string/29611] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2022-09-25 11:40 ` [Bug string/29611] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2022-09-25 13:57 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-09-25 14:09 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-09-25 14:11 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-09-26  5:18 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2022-09-26  5:19 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net [this message]
2022-09-26 14:05 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-09-26 17:52 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 14:01 ` skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 14:01 ` skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 15:01 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 15:10 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2022-09-28 15:52 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 15:57 ` skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 23:14 ` skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 23:15 ` skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
2022-09-29  1:26 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-09-29  1:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  1:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  2:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  3:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29  3:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 23:26 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2022-09-30 20:02 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-01 15:23 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2022-10-01 16:24 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-10-01 16:51 ` goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com
2022-10-01 16:52 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2022-10-03 21:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 21:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 22:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-04  5:05 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-29611-131-DYDCAyxx2O@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).