public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/29621] librtld.os: in function `__register_frame': libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:136: undefined reference to `malloc'
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 05:28:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29621-131-RQ5lOJg0al@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29621-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29621
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
--- Comment #11 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #7)
> Ok, with this one I can see the buildroot failure. It seems that it is
> misconfiguring the stage1 gcc, where the libgcc.a generated is relying on
> the libc for unwinding (thus why ld.so link is failing).
No, this is expected. The libgcc unwinder has depended on glibc symbols for
many, many years. The unwinder cannot be linked into ld.so.
Someone needs to use ld tracing to figure out why __register_frame is pulled
into the ld.so link.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-27 19:44 [Bug libc/29621] New: " james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-09-27 19:44 ` [Bug libc/29621] " james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-09-29 17:45 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-09-29 19:51 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-10-17 12:42 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-26 18:54 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-10-26 19:10 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-26 19:33 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-10-27 14:04 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-27 19:57 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-10-27 21:05 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-27 21:35 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-10-28 5:28 ` fweimer at redhat dot com [this message]
2022-10-28 13:19 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-28 13:36 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-28 16:18 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-10-28 16:32 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2022-10-28 21:23 ` james.hilliard1 at gmail dot com
2022-11-24 17:01 ` arnout at mind dot be
2022-11-24 17:21 ` arnout at mind dot be
2022-11-24 17:27 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2023-08-07 9:37 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2024-01-11 9:41 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-29621-131-RQ5lOJg0al@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).