From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C125B3857803; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:45:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C125B3857803
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1667072749;
	bh=PqW0tROm+MFLN39XdO+StU+oYb9CVKlaN7q6N16TTjI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=W5R7QIYUIjwhYkVQujYO/6O2VDHBQ8AnQXgLzpm8YFDKWLWSFu/ZrkkOmgCgQS9tt
	 HJwoO0VqSEIOqDKXPdB66f4tbvLa+s7xXyS2gkpq+BUG+1iHE76JzZAGMKyAp3v6q+
	 vwRHWsRMx0+FjeQxZWEI0z9JtL4w7xVkLXujnlYY=
From: "syq at debian dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/29730] broken y2038 support in fstatat on MIPS N64
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:45:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.35
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: syq at debian dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29730-131-VDj6iWotmg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29730-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29730-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29730

--- Comment #5 from YunQiang Su <syq at debian dot org> ---
Ohh, you are right.

For __TIMESIZE =3D=3D 64 && __WORDSIZE =3D=3D 32 systems,=20
I think that the kernel should provide a setitimer64 syscall.

Currently, for glibc, maybe that we should define a new macro for
these systems:
   #define KERNEL_SETTIMER_IS_32_BIT

and in setitimer.c



#if KERNEL_SETTIMER_IS_32_BIT
  if (! in_int32_t_range (new_value->it_interval.tv_sec)
      || ! in_int32_t_range (new_value->it_value.tv_sec))
#else
  if (! in_time_t_range (new_value->it_interval.tv_sec)
      || ! in_time_t_range (new_value->it_value.tv_sec))
#endif
    {
      __set_errno (EOVERFLOW);
      return -1;
    }


Anyway, we shouldn't confuse the function name.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=