From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6622C3854556; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:47:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6622C3854556 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1669034876; bh=M6vPwfLNqjQtm6BhgfrZbXQyZKhD5Sfbpp2z7J7MVF8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=aGqCUv6ELMbSkGsTJaoP7nd+6IKqopEwrvsbQT49n1uQi2Ut7A5SQdg1Smq22AMkG a4PP38hgSqtGX4bkGr/fCITE9f4xGJMi8wIHW+ClmvxX++AEq4Jyt3yJmoWXrtXyz4 EDv2+uU2IqHRz/gGBsO0adl4ohpodhxh8evz9c8o= From: "jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/29812] New: Tunables for libstdc++ Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:47:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29812 Bug ID: 29812 Summary: Tunables for libstdc++ Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: libc Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- There are several things I'd like to use tunables for in libstdc++: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D88264 But there's no thread-safe way to do that if libstdc++.so can be dlopened. Would it be possible for glibc to reserve some tunables under the glibcxx.* namespace and provide a safe way for libstdc++ to get read-only access to those? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=