From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 917E238582B0; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:12:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 917E238582B0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1669752766; bh=fiTSw2C0JNEhHgQYhfL5R4XKF240HPVHFE1Y3Oa4gto=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CkUL/nF/nJYNTpnfnrFNHQb1kjgx0Ek05b7a3nP9nfkp90rE5J89pBukL4uj4YOHO 7tnsJzRDZaEbsOPD+yFIx6QNfahcc5DaKNr2O5j4RrBdEMNtmG3fBkfMBvgS1N/4g6 4zgAnr7tTV00WK8iJqnQhqpMT7BjmWsgBpmA+acw= From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug nptl/29834] libpthread.so lacks GLIBC_PRIVATE version for glibc 2.34 and later Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:12:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: nptl X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.34 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29834 Florian Weimer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- Thanks for filing this bug publicly. Do I understand this correctly? The program does not actually need a defini= tion of the weak symbol? And we just run into a limitation in the GNU symbol versioning scheme, where we do not have weak symbol versions at all (VER_FLG_WEAK is generally understood to mean something else)? Would it be sufficient if we make this work again by setting an environment variable? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=