From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 933A63858CDA; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 02:49:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 933A63858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1675306171;
	bh=EP4uRQEgbxn1jAJ16GXlB/3bV9UiZk9xYpmVwmXY75c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MGthchicLG+WEb86k1vQoFyfwzXOaIirOXVdjXMlAlZuM15kpW6zAWJPzpGUrjWyY
	 TVxh9y7PKVs144LBfTurVBZcJ9dXfcZRH2KHl0wcUutmDfrj4IPSz3XiglWuKmMkI7
	 t3DmYcl2IoKFtBj30Be6fi/yovyx2Yf0NP9IHYRA=
From: "carlos at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/30062] glibc 2.36 loader has intermittent segfault
 error on ppc64le
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 02:49:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.36
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-30062-131-iRAXjRj2bq@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-30062-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-30062-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30062

--- Comment #6 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to ChenQi from comment #5)
> I'm running it on qemuppc64. I'll create a simple script and try to
> reproduce the issue under valgrind.

Could you please expand on this? Does this mean you're running
qemu-system-ppc64 on x86_64 hardware? Or are you running qemu-kvm on POWER
hardware? Just for clarity, all the Fedora uses I quoted are running
virtualized with qemu, but on real ppc64le hardware.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=