public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cmuellner at linux dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/30095] New: Inhibit early libcalls before ifunc support is ready Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:55:52 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30095-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30095 Bug ID: 30095 Summary: Inhibit early libcalls before ifunc support is ready Product: glibc Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libc Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: cmuellner at linux dot com CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- When developing a first version of ifunc support for RISC-V, I encountered an endless loop in the first few instructions of a statically linked RV64 binary. When analyzing this issue, I observed that GCC has identified the loop in _dl_aux_init() as memset-zero operation and replaced it with a libcall to memset. This turned out to be problematic because the ifunc support is not ready at that time. One solution is to set a function attribute to inhibit loop-to-libcall transformations by the compiler ("-fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns"). A corresponding patch has been sent as part of the RISC-V ifunc series: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-February/145350.html https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20230207001618.458947-2-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu/ The issue was triggered with GCC upstream/master and glibc upstream/master cross-compiling glibc with "-O3" for RV64. I believe this issue is not caused by a wrong implementation in the RISC-V ifunc support, therefore, I decided the open this ticket (with the hope it can get addressed independently of the ifunc series). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-07 11:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-07 11:55 cmuellner at linux dot com [this message] 2023-02-07 18:31 ` [Bug libc/30095] " adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2023-02-08 9:52 ` cmuellner at linux dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30095-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).