From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 677303858423; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 19:02:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 677303858423
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1675969369;
	bh=D24d0bQZgaTEWkrtqISBEK8hnIJIfzTAwp2hokxKBjI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=B2lfiyYggtve/ZnOxSAmK8gsKBLcS7KjgVjfoQfY7K/lcdVLrYYGnLtbmfMLi9vLJ
	 +cZv5RTZeuUCGHqg6tSRAY3Qhsm83yNyEaWCXpkH1NlK2tuy3BNFhj9dHKD/MYkDZj
	 JeWp/MmDilm+zjWGh7TmvbQjsdRgHc6jYk+4sigk=
From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org"
 <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/30100] [patch] add dlmem()
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 19:02:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.38
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-30100-131-x6esXEMeWl@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-30100-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-30100-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30100

--- Comment #19 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot o=
rg> ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #18)
> Still have dozens of failures like this:
>=20
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/sys/shm.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/sys/socket.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/sys/time.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/sys/timeb.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/sys/uio.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/sys/wait.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/syslog.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/termios.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/time.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/ucontext.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/ulimit.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/unistd.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/utmpx.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: conform/XPG42/wordexp.h/linknamespace
> FAIL: elf/check-abi-libc
>=20
> Not sure if they are related to my patch or not...
> To be figured out.

Most likely you are issuing a libc function without using its internal alias
(for instance mmap64 instead of __mmap64).  The linknamespace.out file will
hint you which symbol is polluting the namespace.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=