From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A1F443858D32; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 16:55:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A1F443858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1677430518; bh=B4gqFmySmKaAz2PDxqfrgQdsdpWBt8IBnGo1f3n4QuA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=D7izpuEL/l90oAUYj56kl0joXR+TTwTH31IQkxTp/8J6E9b/N9fRl9qGxwQ3OU4cN 4DLB+T8ayQhI/4T8PAKW6aK0H7k4VgYdo78w6Hk0OEw72e2yiUP8YWxaMYRoWj8i9N +Q4URoUUse9KzdijQiNp051ZE4t0RSmYImVNyBAA= From: "janderson at rice dot edu" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/30134] DT_AUDIT is ignored for dlopen()ed solib Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 16:55:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.38 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janderson at rice dot edu X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30134 --- Comment #12 from Jonathon Anderson --- (In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #11) > (In reply to Jonathon Anderson from comment #10) > > One namespace per auditor is very convenient for us, please don't chang= e it. >=20 > Thanks for info. > But I think the "audit_hook from solib" > trick you described in another ticket, can > be used here too (with DT_AUDIT on dlopened > solib) because DT_AUDIT should be loaded > before solib itself. Continuing thoughts from the other ticket (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30127#c27). Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the solib mapped before DT_AUDIT is read= ? So the proposed la_premap wouldn't apply to the solib with the DT_AUDIT, only = to what it loads and whatever gets loaded later? Which doesn't sound at all li= ke what you want. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=