From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 17B493858417; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:56:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 17B493858417 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1687964194; bh=iUjwH066XtboGLcknva1gRyAYjsxsRFZ3KxWvFFv+AQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wZKgWPSiw2N3+yj4T63GkGVVtpGHSIQVxfx1xZar68riUHNiUlh3sHk70cpisGNCP GrGZhhUFT97TUZWcPsNCWI6aeI13jMlf6oxT+tw932M3yfwDLR8Rzf9cnz9zfgfiVS EFVHfvSsLPViAhXZTWXWavY+oRpSebFNgM5EtcZ4= From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug nptl/30587] FAIL: nptl/tst-cleanupx4 on hppa Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:56:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: nptl X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30587 Carlos O'Donell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlos at redhat dot com --- Comment #10 from Carlos O'Donell --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #9) > The test doesn't fail if xread is moved into tst-cleanup4.c. > The problem is xread.c is not compiled with "-fexceptions".=C2=A0 The > nptl/tst-cleanupx4 test > passes if xread.c is compiled with "-fexceptions". Then this is not a regression but is a pre-existing problem with libsupport= .a. We need to compile the support routine infrastructure with "-fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables" to make sure we can always unwind through the wrappers which themselves may call functions which we know we can unwind through. This needs a patch to fix support/Makefile to add it to all routines. Dave, Can you please propose a patch to do that? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=