From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6E4CB3857012; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:23:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6E4CB3857012 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1688059423; bh=GFWVFgFBohXRfwyBSKCK/i1p/2gCq8SEZ9seGsJZ/S8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EFxcG07fwh/9tEMostS7k5BGbIZTUhFqSC5w54+sRTu1jIndqax0MXlXkuK7TVchV yZHgCe5lzzrmLJ2WWybbfSKlUsBLMLcq0p6bmM7axS9lROLhUkPvDphNvuwZTZiWY9 7+tKmKxmmotY6vmf5H75L0gJC2cI2Oxpqowtc+8U= From: "schwab@linux-m68k.org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/30597] cacheflush(2) is not implemented on RISC-V Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:23:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: schwab@linux-m68k.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30597 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- cacheflush is currently only defined for architectures that have the cachef= lush syscall. The arguments of the riscv specific syscall riscv_flush_icache are dissimmilar to the ones of the various cacheflush syscalls. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=