From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 390283858427; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:42:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 390283858427 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1714495346; bh=sHDXLKGd6iWTZfJcv5l8dYe5iPaouy6KUPCZ0IxDb8A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EW+kYeIyHJCYGw6MaBgWVJ1H2wCnnMc1d1nDiswETkkF123V3g+gQ7aigeP6MzQhI ZRIkdfBmutkwfNovZ+ZGgXPsye3fnxS/G3Q/j8Smz411/hELEinPEVTd2s9WPhXQNO ARHpnZ6ah1aQ1Nw41+art26JZdcXEh48dxTHM4jw= From: "carlos at redhat dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug stdio/30647] scanf functions wrong on nan() Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:42:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: stdio X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.37 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30647 Carlos O'Donell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlos at redhat dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-04-30 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Carlos O'Donell --- I agree this does look like a conformance issue with the scanf family of functions using __vfscanf_internal() implemetnation. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=