public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bruno at clisp dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug manual/31019] New: The documentation of feenableexcept is incomplete
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 01:29:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31019-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31019

            Bug ID: 31019
           Summary: The documentation of feenableexcept is incomplete
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.35
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: manual
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: bruno at clisp dot org
                CC: mtk.manpages at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 15202
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15202&action=edit
test case foo.c

The attached simple program, that enables floating-point exception traps on
FE_INVALID, when the exception flag for FE_INVALID is already set, show CPU
dependent behaviour.

How to reproduce:
1. Compile it with: ${CC-gcc} -ggdb -Wall foo.c -lm
2. Run it with: ./a.out; echo $?

Results with glibc:
x86_64       0
i386         Floating point exception (core dumped)
arm64        3
armelhf      3
armel        3
hppa         0
ia64         0
loongarch64  0
m68k         0
mips         0
mips64       0
powerpc      Floating point exception
powerpc64    Floating point exception
powerpc64le  Floating point exception
riscv64      3
s390         0
s390x        0
sh4          0
sparc        0
sparc64      0

I think that it is not possible to make i386 and powerpc* behave like the other
CPU types; see
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2023-10/msg00104.html for why.

Nevertheless it is surprising to see platform-dependent behaviour. This was
also the reason for bug#16209.

Since the function feenableexcept is not defined by a standard, the definitive
documentation is the glibc manual. If there is a situation where the results
are undefined or platform-dependent, the documentation should tell so.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-01  1:29 bruno at clisp dot org [this message]
2023-11-01  1:30 ` [Bug manual/31019] " bruno at clisp dot org
2023-11-01  1:32 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2023-12-19 18:38 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31019-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).