From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8F72C385DC1F; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 20:14:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8F72C385DC1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1706818495; bh=DdahUGgVfoqp1ZMiDJlTcZACtymtwYikhb53xdM8Nwo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qM2EQ1FUFH1oKDAkL4JkV2ybOUWbxGe+cqJLpBaDAO5iKfaXVK2oQoixNDanHXUK5 5nJ3UbuTc//lyzgp+hpCdLppjpiyUtWD8Yy+VmKv3sAAg9sTOWOl+DzrxGIovdgKZv QvZVKIodpbhxGDkoFozviczIQwQEJYq0MqK+/nb0= From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/31068] sysdeps: sparc: invalid data access in memset due to regression Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 20:14:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.36 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 2.39 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31068 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |glaubitz at physik dot fu-= berlin.d | |e --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #1) > Fixed on 2.39. Does this by any chance need to be fixed on sparc64 as well? This bug could be the reason for the posix_spawn() bug we're seeing on spar= c64. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=