public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libc/31068] sysdeps: sparc: invalid data access in memset due to regression
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 20:51:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31068-131-lh7IrAbc8Q@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31068-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31068

--- Comment #4 from Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3)
> (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #1)
> > Fixed on 2.39.
> 
> Does this by any chance need to be fixed on sparc64 as well?
> 
> This bug could be the reason for the posix_spawn() bug we're seeing on
> sparc64.

The sparc64 changes were less intrusive and I could not see any change that
might trigger it.  The niagara4 changes slight the alignment of the 'clr'
instruction:

diff --git a/sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/multiarch/memset-niagara4.S
b/sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/multiarch/memset-niagara4.S
index 1ccf24e516..d6fbd83009 100644
--- a/sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/multiarch/memset-niagara4.S
+++ b/sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/multiarch/memset-niagara4.S
@@ -39,10 +39,6 @@ ENTRY(__memset_niagara4)
        sllx            %o2, 32, %g1
        ba,pt           %icc, 1f
         or             %g1, %o2, %o4
-END(__memset_niagara4)
-
-       .align          32
-ENTRY(__bzero_niagara4)
        clr             %o4
 1:     cmp             %o1, 16
        ble             %icc, .Ltiny
@@ -118,6 +114,6 @@ ENTRY(__bzero_niagara4)
        bne,pt          %icc, 1b
         add            %o0, 0x30, %o0
        ba,a,pt         %icc, .Lpostloop
-END(__bzero_niagara4)
+END(__memset_niagara4)

 #endif

But afaiu this should not change the correctness of the code. 

Also, unless you are building with --disable-multi-arch; sparc64 string tests
will check for every string implementation currently supported by the CPU. So I
would expect that a failure in memset would trigger at least one regression as
for sparc32.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15  9:32 [Bug libc/31068] New: " ludwig.rydberg at gaisler dot com
2023-11-15  9:34 ` [Bug libc/31068] " sam at gentoo dot org
2023-11-16 14:11 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2024-02-01 20:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 20:14 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2024-02-01 20:51 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31068-131-lh7IrAbc8Q@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).