From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7A3CE3857828; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:06:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7A3CE3857828 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1704218797; bh=lzjXlFrVwJzqifmIkx2NY0m0s/8KFhfIEW9JOACaWXA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UzblxSLIlIOhQB+EYqnTyp/3F61e+ZbX4yJRps0aaNeOKDzN16zL6YczPDdMR7TgE D/3roTVpaSN0BqSZf3973fQG4hd+7Jp7r4WGt1F8CA8futmB4eMsj64O0Ss0Oz92jc 2v7SyxMnLVGJDO1A4y3ccQFRtZ2XQ526iyagh/HA= From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/31186] Some dirent/io tests don't work on xfs Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:06:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.39 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31186 Adhemerval Zanella changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #10 from Adhemerval Zanella --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #9) > 32-bit compatibility on XFS requires using the inode32 option: > https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/xfs.5.html >=20 > (No such option exists with btrfs, by the way, and you need to reformat if > you exceed the 32-bit inode space.) >=20 > So I think this bug is different from the d_off issue and invalid from a > glibc perspective. The dirent/list failure is related, since on my BZ#28824 proposed fix I did= not consider that d_ino might overflow. But the rest of the failures do seem t= o be related to the XFS inode64, where symlink (io/tst-ftw-lnk) and stat (io/ftwtest) are failing due FS overflow values. Should we mark this as WONTFIX/NOTABUG? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=