From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 79E0C3858D39; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:42:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 79E0C3858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1703878955; bh=p34Zvm/vmGyxVYdthaTJOTwGbDnBJKu9eN909dbwhlk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xtk7+aUYWj/N6mayZwtZJFwnZ702b2mbXBe0iJSffyQKO9pp/N+NQdGYJUCr9tlFr 71BTqtigWLY4z4Fv0pujeLQxB2Jtvv6ErR1MSG1hxSG9qscMcf1BS01QsdANP+quIb wQRgzjyLyeN7LU1YITnS7E48sUQVIhut1fKNpbbY= From: "adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/31186] Some dirent/io tests don't work on xfs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:42:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.39 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31186 --- Comment #6 from Adhemerval Zanella --- (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #5) > Right, so XFS essentially does not support non-LFS calls. I am not sure > which is the best way to handle it, with my patchset I can also clamp d_i= no > and not advertise EOVERFLOW. I am not fully sure about the implications. Scratch that, I just recalled that we always use getdents64 syscall even for non-LFS. As fair I recall, EXT4 will clamp the values anyway so I think gl= ibc will either need to do something similar or revert to use non-LFS getdents syscall (which I would like to avoid...). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=