public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
@ 2024-01-30 13:25 schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 18:44 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31317] " palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2024-01-30 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Bug ID: 31317
Summary: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
Product: glibc
Version: 2.39
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: dynamic-link
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: schwab@linux-m68k.org
Target Milestone: ---
When running a static PIE created by the mold linker, it crashes during self
relocation while it tries to look up the __global_pointer$ symbols. That
happens because the mold linker puts the relocation addend of a RELATIVE also
in the relocated field (unlike the BFD linker, which sets it to zero).
From sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h:
if (l->l_type == lt_executable && l->l_scope != NULL)
In elf_machine_runtime_setup the condition l->l_scope != NULL references an
unrelocated pointer (where l points to the statically initialized _dl_main_map)
which is never NULL in a static PIE produced by ld.mold.
The failure can be seen in the mold testsuite (riscv64-ifunc-static-pie and
riscv64-static-pie).
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/devel:gcc:next/mold/openSUSE_Factory_RISCV/riscv64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2024-02-22 18:44 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 21:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: palmer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
IIUC this is an ABI grey area. I guess we could write down this as a
requirement and then call it a mold bug, but it seems better to just stop
taking advantage of the behavior if we can. I guess something like
diff --git a/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h b/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h
index 0cbb476c05..a540760f6f 100644
--- a/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h
+++ b/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ elf_machine_runtime_setup (struct link_map *l, struct
r_scope_elem *scope[],
gotplt[1] = (ElfW(Addr)) l;
}
- if (l->l_type == lt_executable && l->l_scope != NULL)
+ if (l->l_type == lt_executable && l->l_relocated && l->l_scope != NULL)
{
/* The __global_pointer$ may not be defined by the linker if the
$gp register does not be used to access the global variable
would squash the crash. Maybe that's good enough for static-PIE? We also load
up GP in _start, and it's not like MIPS where we have per-object GP values so I
think we should be safe?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 18:44 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31317] " palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 21:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 22:53 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2024-02-22 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
l_scope is never null, this condition needs to be removed again. It's simply
the wrong check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 18:44 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31317] " palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 21:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2024-02-22 22:53 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 23:01 ` vineet.gupta at linux dot dev
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: palmer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot o
| |rg
--- Comment #3 from Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2)
> l_scope is never null, this condition needs to be removed again. It's
> simply the wrong check.
Sorry, I think I'm a bit lost here. IIUC we don't actually need GP set at this
point for static-PIE, as it's done in _start. So I maybe something like this
diff --git a/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h b/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h
index 0cbb476c05..ae38df4bc1 100644
--- a/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h
+++ b/sysdeps/riscv/dl-machine.h
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ elf_machine_runtime_setup (struct link_map *l, struct
r_scope_elem *scope[],
gotplt[1] = (ElfW(Addr)) l;
}
- if (l->l_type == lt_executable && l->l_scope != NULL)
+ if (l->l_type == lt_executable && scope != NULL)
{
/* The __global_pointer$ may not be defined by the linker if the
$gp register does not be used to access the global variable
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ elf_machine_runtime_setup (struct link_map *l, struct
r_scope_elem *scope[],
const ElfW(Sym) *ref = &gp_sym;
_dl_lookup_symbol_x ("__global_pointer$", l, &ref,
- l->l_scope, NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
+ scope, NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
if (ref)
asm (
"mv gp, %0\n"
should do it? This relies on the caller to obtain scope, the static-PIE call
sets it to NULL and the others set it to l_scope.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-22 22:53 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 23:01 ` vineet.gupta at linux dot dev
2024-02-22 23:16 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: vineet.gupta at linux dot dev @ 2024-02-22 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta at linux dot dev> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |maskray at google dot com,
| |vineet.gupta at linux dot dev,
| |yanzhang.wang at intel dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-22 23:01 ` vineet.gupta at linux dot dev
@ 2024-02-22 23:16 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 23:26 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2024-02-22 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
No, l_relocated is probably the correct condition. The point is that l_scope
is always initialized, and it is only null because of undefined behaviour.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-22 23:16 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2024-02-22 23:26 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-23 3:06 ` yanzhang.wang at intel dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: palmer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
--- Comment #5 from Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> No, l_relocated is probably the correct condition. The point is that
> l_scope is always initialized, and it is only null because of undefined
> behaviour.
OK, that makes sense. IIUC the relocated check short-circuits that UB, so it'd
just be useless to also check l_scope? Either way I think we're far enough
along for a real patch, I sent
https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20240222232400.6326-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-22 23:26 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-23 3:06 ` yanzhang.wang at intel dot com
2024-03-06 14:44 ` rjones at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: yanzhang.wang at intel dot com @ 2024-02-23 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
--- Comment #6 from Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang at intel dot com> ---
I think the l_relocated is enough too.
I have did some investigation about this in the GNU ld and mold. If I
understand correctly, the mold will fill the relocated field if the command
option --apply-dynamic-relocs is true, whose default value is true.
But for GNU ld, this is ignored and skipped at
elfnn-riscv.c:riscv_elf_relocate_section
sreloc = elf_section_data (input_section)->sreloc;
riscv_elf_append_rela (output_bfd, sreloc, &outrel);
if (!relocate)
continue;
Although the relative rel has been computed but the relocate is true, so we do
nothing.
It seems this is not defined explicit somewhere and all the two different
behaviors seems right.
For this case, the l_scope in dl_main_map is a pointer and need relocate. In
the mold linker, the value in relocated field will be the value of global
dl_main_map's location. But in GNU ld, the value will be 0.
So we need only to use the l_relocated, it's a value which will not be relocaed
and will be set at the end of _dl_relocate_static_pie.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-23 3:06 ` yanzhang.wang at intel dot com
@ 2024-03-06 14:44 ` rjones at redhat dot com
2024-03-25 14:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rjones at redhat dot com @ 2024-03-06 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Richard Jones <rjones at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rjones at redhat dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-06 14:44 ` rjones at redhat dot com
@ 2024-03-25 14:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 13:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-10-13 17:07 ` cyy at cyyself dot name
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-25 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Schwab <schwab@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=96d1b9ac2321b565f340ba8f3674597141e3450d
commit 96d1b9ac2321b565f340ba8f3674597141e3450d
Author: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Date: Thu Feb 22 15:24:00 2024 -0800
RISC-V: Fix the static-PIE non-relocated object check
The value of l_scope is only valid post relocation, so this original
check was triggering undefined behavior. Instead just directly check to
see if the object has been relocated, at which point using l_scope is
safe.
Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Closes: BZ #31317
Fixes: e0590f41fe ("RISC-V: Enable static-pie.")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-25 14:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-26 13:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-10-13 17:07 ` cyy at cyyself dot name
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2024-03-26 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |2.40
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug dynamic-link/31317] [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-26 13:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2024-10-13 17:07 ` cyy at cyyself dot name
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cyy at cyyself dot name @ 2024-10-13 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31317
Yangyu Chen <cyy at cyyself dot name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cyy at cyyself dot name
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-13 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-30 13:25 [Bug dynamic-link/31317] New: [RISCV] static PIE crashes during self relocation schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 18:44 ` [Bug dynamic-link/31317] " palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 21:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 22:53 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 23:01 ` vineet.gupta at linux dot dev
2024-02-22 23:16 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-02-22 23:26 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-23 3:06 ` yanzhang.wang at intel dot com
2024-03-06 14:44 ` rjones at redhat dot com
2024-03-25 14:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 13:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2024-10-13 17:07 ` cyy at cyyself dot name
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).