From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 112643858D37; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 20:56:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 112643858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1707684997;
	bh=Xd7LSpm/XFRUWSu1eIVrMit0WUwZuckCzzmzt1CCgqY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DWqCPyLDeWUZyXYrq4YmCA8xGj5JMQ+wT6Es6QrOI3n/AiooB6+dVdIioiElI7cNr
	 PNbcJPwz6XnhLqKwXMCyIpN61suFSrk36kYVnuVxLzRQMxNusUO1Akb/xjnuzpnde7
	 C6QJlHgb+9cPPGRNsAwpPcDOzM81n/aFv/EQfkKA=
From: "fw at deneb dot enyo.de" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/31371] x86-64: APX registers aren't preserved in
 ld.so trampoline
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 20:56:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: dynamic-link
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.40
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at deneb dot enyo.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-31371-131-oqnkqFjqxj@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-31371-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-31371-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31371

Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fw at deneb dot enyo.de

--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo.de> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> > This only matters if BIND_NOW is used with a non-psABI calling conventi=
on,
> > right?
>=20
> Did you mean "BIND_NOW isn't used"?

Yes, indeed.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=