From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E1418385842D; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:03:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1418385842D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1708689838; bh=2cBLmxHIqDYhXp8mYGjfxAoCeejqQsZS0fUY+6ReKeI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TGJN9JFU3Gy8Xv0W7K+bNk7JtOjRCqlPpCYww1S4NK9c9GfirQYkufZg8zghe7CWI sfoFK/bDyys2+wvLHhciAlQd87b8VcpYsAxyckikfISAD+3Y1NA92OEaQJaRF/R0WL eLAZl6FDjWprlsPP8hv9c6879r7ewP91m2Bwa+hI= From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug libc/31394] clone on sparc might fail with -EFAULT for no valid reason Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:03:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: libc X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.38 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31394 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #2) > The explanation sounds reasonable, but I would like to get some confirmat= ion > from kernel developers that this is the issue before applying this > workaround on glibc. I have tried to get feedback from David Miller and developers from Oracle, = but so far without any success. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=