From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6D3DB3858CD1; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:21:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D3DB3858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1710879702; bh=rePfSRUOMLg47uVDJW7mVz42INS8Rq2o+Fca+CVpfd8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JeKed2smKkEp4EyaYQq1ObMczGwHPPxTWH+/onNAZ3dcfz5Xv1DG4GdxqNEaDXwHI QLH7gU7OOjBvOWSgLV4QfOwRPB3ALg/DAWrnFAnYJj5nZB2JtiWrICrdqUGlhN8Mi/ Mr6abe6XYPfX1AvG0RVU7sA6CapFExKO3z9yFxJw= From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug time/31510] Wrong type for timeval.tv_usec on 32-bit archs with _TIME_BITS=64 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:21:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: time X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31510 --- Comment #2 from Joseph Myers --- Shouldn't we fix how suseconds_t is defined in glibc in the 64-bit time cas= e? It's not as if any interfaces in glibc use suseconds_t other than as part of struct timeval (though we should still warn in NEWS about potential compatibility issues for any interfaces using suseconds_t in third-party libraries). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=