public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/31757] New: Should XXXf128_do_not_use functions be excluded?
@ 2024-05-19 22:41 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2024-05-19 22:48 ` [Bug build/31757] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2024-05-19 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: glibc-bugs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31757

            Bug ID: 31757
           Summary: Should XXXf128_do_not_use functions be excluded?
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.40
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: build
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                CC: carlos at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

On x86-64, libc provides finitef128_do_not_use,
isinff128_do_not_use and isnanf128_do_not_use.  Should they be excluded?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-24 12:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-19 22:41 [Bug build/31757] New: Should XXXf128_do_not_use functions be excluded? hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2024-05-19 22:48 ` [Bug build/31757] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2024-05-22 13:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-24 12:50 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).