From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1C5063858D29; Sun,  9 Jun 2024 13:44:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1C5063858D29
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1717940649;
	bh=6D1GSxCaP7DlPD+vgBNLzWuVbeSjoZ+zxLbQw0G8uXM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=g2cWh629rnXkDK0cxr4Tw2mTYyeqp9iJhQ9k3Xjj6zjh++ltpepMorGqQlOvBBNED
	 5rJKDBFisYEFkN/gL3MHCVQBe62qofLXBfMiN1UeTe3I4YkSOxPF7Wbh7YbNZ3ieGT
	 wx+If2mV7rURhIOPJ4oTxXYUOYByQcjoVsmNGZws=
From: "sam at gentoo dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/31867] "CPU ISA level is lower than required" on
 SSE2-free CPUs
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 13:44:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: build
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sam at gentoo dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-31867-131-I1dSE7tMbZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-31867-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-31867-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <glibc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31867

Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |awilfox at adelielinux dot=
 org

--- Comment #4 from Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> I still see the v3 marker appearing unexpectedly, so investigating more.

I think ignore the v3 thing. This appears to be a separate issue.

(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> > I still see the v3 marker appearing unexpectedly, so investigating more.
>=20
> (Is there a way to get bfd to print why it's adding a marker? e.g. inheri=
ted
> from X obj)

I'll file a bfd bug for discussion.

--

Patch posted by awilfox:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20240609133933.62366-1-AWilcox@Wilc=
ox-Tech.com/T/#u

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=