[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---
           Assignee|gotom at debian dot or.jp          |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reopening to fix.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 2.22.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  4e5f9259f352a9547b7cc35d675eac3050ed5803 (commit)
      from  cf06a4e3579d834c3330184c4ff127c98bc00fcc (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=4e5f9259f352a9547b7cc35d675eac3050ed5803

commit 4e5f9259f352a9547b7cc35d675eac3050ed5803
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Fri May 22 17:14:04 2015 +0000

    Restore _POSIX2_C_VERSION definition (bug 438).

    My review of conformtest expectations for POSIX showed up that the
    _POSIX2_C_VERSION macro, required by POSIX and XPG standards before
    2001, was missing in unistd.h, having been removed on 2003-04-03
    despite those standards still being supported.  This patch adds it
    back.  As it's in the implementation namespace, there's no need for it
    to be conditional, and other such macros aren't conditional in this
    header either.

    Tested for x86_64 and x86 (testsuite).  Note that this *does* change
    the installed libraries, because it affects the sysconf support
    (present all along) for _SC_2_C_VERSION.

        [BZ #438]
        * posix/unistd.h (_POSIX2_C_VERSION): New macro.
        * conform/Makefile (test-xfail-POSIX/unistd.h/conform): Remove
        variable.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 ChangeLog        |    5 +++++
 NEWS             |   21 +++++++++++----------
 conform/Makefile |    1 -
 posix/unistd.h   |    3 +++
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[drepper at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2005-09-26 14:57 -------
If youwant to use POSIX info you should know the standard.  I don't want to add
more junk to the headers than we already have.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[wharms at bfs dot de]

------- Additional Comments From wharms at bfs dot de  2004-10-11 07:33 -------
An other solution is to leave is as comment. so ppl like me that do not
read the changes standards every morning have a change to find out.
Example:
/*
_POSIX2_C_VERSION has been removed in XPG6.
 POSIX Standard approved as ISO/IEC 9945-2 as of December, 1993.
#define _POSIX2_C_VERSION       199209L
*/

-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[jakub at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com  2004-10-10 18:14 -------
See
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/unistd.h.html#tag_13_80_10
_POSIX2_C_VERSION has been removed in XPG6.

Not sure whether we shouldn't define it anyway when -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 (but
not -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600) though and whether it would be ok if _POSIX2_C_VERSION
in that case would be 199506L while _POSIX2_VERSION 200112L.

-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug libc/438] _POSIX2_C_VERSION got missing

[wharms at bfs dot de]

------- Additional Comments From wharms at bfs dot de  2004-10-10 17:22 -------
ups, 
its glibc 2.3.3 not gcc of cause


-- 


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.