public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "llucax at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug libc/4737] fork is not async-signal-safe
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-4737-131-Z6GoIdhtNW@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-4737-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4737

--- Comment #20 from Leandro Lucarella <llucax at gmail dot com> 2011-10-13 17:52:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 5987
  --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5987
Test case for what could be a related problem

I'm having a problem with a rare interaction between fork() and malloc() that
looks like it could be related to this issue.

The test case attached is the most reduced test case I could came up with. This
is based on some trickery done to implement a concurrent garbage collector.

The program eventually hangs and this is the backtrace I get:

Thread 3 (Thread 0x7ffff7028700 (LWP 10504)):
#0  __lll_lock_wait_private () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:97
#1  0x00007ffff78a837e in _L_lock_36 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2  0x00007ffff78a067c in ptmalloc_lock_all () at arena.c:288
#3  0x00007ffff78d7635 in __libc_fork () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/../fork.c:95
#4  0x0000000000400c3b in do_fork ()
#5  0x00007ffff7bc4d8c in start_thread (arg=0x7ffff7028700) at
pthread_create.c:304
#6  0x00007ffff791004d in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112
#7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Thread 2 (Thread 0x7ffff7829700 (LWP 10503)):
#0  0x00007ffff785e084 in do_sigsuspend (set=<value optimized out>) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigsuspend.c:63
#1  __sigsuspend (set=<value optimized out>) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigsuspend.c:78
#2  0x0000000000400bc1 in signal_handler ()
#3  <signal handler called>
#4  0x00007ffff78a222f in _int_free (av=0x7ffff7bb91c0, p=0x603240) at
malloc.c:4780
#5  0x00007ffff78a68e3 in __libc_free (mem=<value optimized out>) at
malloc.c:3738
#6  0x0000000000400d3e in do_malloc ()
#7  0x00007ffff7bc4d8c in start_thread (arg=0x7ffff7829700) at
pthread_create.c:304
#8  0x00007ffff791004d in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112
#9  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff7fd7720 (LWP 10500)):
#0  0x00007ffff7bc606d in pthread_join (threadid=140737345918720,
thread_return=0x0) at pthread_join.c:89
#1  0x0000000000400f82 in main ()


Is this related to the same lock that prevents fork() from being async-safe? If
this is the case, I think it won't be considered a bug, right?

TIA

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


       reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-4737-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-10-13 17:53 ` llucax at gmail dot com [this message]
2011-10-13 17:54 ` llucax at gmail dot com
2011-10-13 17:56 ` llucax at gmail dot com
2011-10-14 14:06 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-03-27 13:43 ` krebbel1 at de dot ibm.com
2012-04-11  7:58 ` aj at suse dot de
2014-02-16 19:42 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:41 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-08-25  2:25 ` naesten at gmail dot com
2015-05-07 15:27 ` gbenson at redhat dot com
2021-06-28 19:00 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org
2007-07-04  1:35 [Bug libc/4737] New: " nmiell at comcast dot net
2008-10-11 18:47 ` [Bug libc/4737] " morten+sources dot redhat dot com at afdelingp dot dk
2008-10-20 11:47 ` morten+sources dot redhat dot com at afdelingp dot dk
2008-10-21  5:13 ` nmiell at comcast dot net
2008-10-30 14:55 ` morten+sources dot redhat dot com at afdelingp dot dk
2008-11-05  9:00 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-05  9:57 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-06 23:10 ` nmiell at comcast dot net
2008-11-07  1:10 ` morten+sources dot redhat dot com at afdelingp dot dk
2008-11-11 21:35 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-11 21:41 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-11 22:04 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-18 22:30 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-18 23:45 ` rsa at us dot ibm dot com
2008-11-18 23:57 ` rsa at us dot ibm dot com
2008-11-19  1:39 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2008-11-19 16:23 ` rsa at us dot ibm dot com
2009-01-14  1:22 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2009-01-14  8:46 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2009-01-14  9:44 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com
2009-01-16 17:19 ` tom dot honermann at oracle dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-4737-131-Z6GoIdhtNW@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).