From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5995 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2012 21:20:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 5797 invoked by uid 55); 3 Oct 2012 21:19:45 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com Subject: [Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: stdio X-Bugzilla-Keywords: glibc_2.11, glibc_2.13, glibc_2.16 X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 2.17 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact glibc-bugs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: glibc-bugs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #32 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-10-03 21:19:42 UTC --- On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, jrnieder at gmail dot com wrote: > Do I understand correctly that this means testing the patch against > 2.16, 2.15, 2.14, 2.12, and 2.11 and then filing one bug for each > branch describing the result? There is no real evidence of 2.14 or 2.12 being alive - no response from their maintainer when I asked on libc-alpha whether they are alive or dead - and 2.11 is considered dead . I don't think it's worth doing any backports to those three branches. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.