public inbox for glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-21 2:36 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-26 23:38 ` nix at esperi dot org.uk
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-21 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos at systemhalted dot
| |org
Component|libc |build
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-21 2:36 ` [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-26 23:38 ` nix at esperi dot org.uk
2012-03-01 5:55 ` jyasskin at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: nix at esperi dot org.uk @ 2012-02-26 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Nix <nix at esperi dot org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #3087|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #9 from Nix <nix at esperi dot org.uk> 2012-02-26 23:37:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 6248
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6248
stack protector support against eglibc 2.13.
This is the most recent version of this patch, against eglibc 2.13 (because
that happens to be the version I'm using now, as I track Debian's glibc). It
has needed no significant revisions for years, though the recent csu changes in
upstream glibc may necessitate some small revisions.
(The ChangeLog is out of date: I haven't regenerated it since 2008.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-21 2:36 ` [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-26 23:38 ` nix at esperi dot org.uk
@ 2012-03-01 5:55 ` jyasskin at gmail dot com
2012-03-01 16:32 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jyasskin at gmail dot com @ 2012-03-01 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jyasskin at gmail dot com
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-01 5:55 ` jyasskin at gmail dot com
@ 2012-03-01 16:32 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2012-04-21 12:56 ` aj at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: carlos at systemhalted dot org @ 2012-03-01 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|drepper.fsp at gmail dot |unassigned at sourceware
|com |dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-01 16:32 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
@ 2012-04-21 12:56 ` aj at suse dot de
2014-02-16 19:20 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: aj at suse dot de @ 2012-04-21 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aj at suse dot de
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-04-21 12:55:37 UTC ---
Your change contains two different changes:
* Supporting stack-protector
* A different implementation of chk_fail function
For addition to glibc, I would only look at the stack-protector support. I
suggest you continue discussing this on the libc-alpha list.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-21 12:56 ` aj at suse dot de
@ 2014-02-16 19:20 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:45 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com @ 2014-02-16 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-16 19:20 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
@ 2014-05-28 19:45 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-07-01 21:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-07-03 6:05 ` naesten at gmail dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: schwab at sourceware dot org @ 2014-05-28 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Andreas Schwab <schwab at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-28 19:45 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
@ 2014-07-01 21:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-07-03 6:05 ` naesten at gmail dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-07-01 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-01 21:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2014-07-03 6:05 ` naesten at gmail dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: naesten at gmail dot com @ 2014-07-03 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Samuel Bronson <naesten at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|unspecified |2.13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-03 6:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-7065-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-21 2:36 ` [Bug build/7065] Support building glibc with -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-all jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-26 23:38 ` nix at esperi dot org.uk
2012-03-01 5:55 ` jyasskin at gmail dot com
2012-03-01 16:32 ` carlos at systemhalted dot org
2012-04-21 12:56 ` aj at suse dot de
2014-02-16 19:20 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:45 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-07-01 21:00 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2014-07-03 6:05 ` naesten at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).