* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-12-14 15:11 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2012-02-21 1:51 ` [Bug network/9954] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: allan at archlinux dot org @ 2010-12-14 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |allan at archlinux dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-14 15:11 ` [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason allan at archlinux dot org
@ 2012-02-21 1:51 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-19 10:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-21 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|libc |network
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-14 15:11 ` [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason allan at archlinux dot org
2012-02-21 1:51 ` [Bug network/9954] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-19 10:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-06-28 8:56 ` maze+sourceware at strahlungsfrei dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2012-12-19 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|drepper.fsp at gmail dot |unassigned at sourceware
|com |dot org
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-12-19 10:46 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2013-06-28 8:56 ` maze+sourceware at strahlungsfrei dot de
2013-10-25 4:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: maze+sourceware at strahlungsfrei dot de @ 2013-06-28 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
maze+sourceware at strahlungsfrei dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |maze+sourceware@strahlungsf
| |rei.de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-28 8:56 ` maze+sourceware at strahlungsfrei dot de
@ 2013-10-25 4:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-25 5:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-25 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
via 894f3f1049135dcbeaab8f18690973663ef3147c (commit)
from b85545a67110b236676aec8000f52d8385465660 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=894f3f1049135dcbeaab8f18690973663ef3147c
commit 894f3f1049135dcbeaab8f18690973663ef3147c
Author: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Date: Fri Oct 25 14:25:38 2013 +1000
Fix incorrect getaddrinfo assertion trigger
[BZ #9954]
With the following /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 www.my-domain.es
127.0.1.1 www.my-domain.es
192.168.0.1 www.my-domain.es
Using getaddrinfo() on www.my-domain.es, trigger the following assertion:
../sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c:1473: rfc3484_sort: Assertion
`src->results[i].native == -1 || src->results[i].native == a1_native'
failed.
This is due to two different bugs:
- In rfc3484_sort() rule 7, src->results[i].native is assigned even if
src->results[i].index is -1, meaning that no interface is associated.
- In getaddrinfo() the source IP address used with the lo interface needs a
special case, as it can be any IP within 127.X.Y.Z.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
ChangeLog | 8 ++++++++
sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c | 13 ++++++++++---
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-25 4:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-25 5:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
2013-10-25 5:12 ` law at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: allan at archlinux dot org @ 2013-10-25 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org> ---
Fixed in master
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-25 5:04 ` allan at archlinux dot org
@ 2013-10-25 5:12 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-10-25 14:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2013-10-25 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
law at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 from law at redhat dot com ---
Whee, another patch that Fedora won't have to carry around anymore. Glad to
see these bugs with patches being fixed over time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-25 5:12 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2013-10-25 14:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-16 18:23 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-25 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
via 0b0e50ce9efe2fec10e147eddba4f0802235a042 (commit)
via 54377921e7092f709c6a5985688769404637055f (commit)
via 9a010a5f6328aa7ba353679e9a9e07465917d6a0 (commit)
via f03cfdf9bf62f776338171fe2ba6eebbf8948875 (commit)
via 6957bcb15456b5118c44bb49754b199462336639 (commit)
via 56532663f2881ce7b7996d75dbb6bbb438187457 (commit)
via 52b8d67f22068991f404c51b38b30e7e35c1bb99 (commit)
via dc7ba1835ba16cb49d6c38d50e153b70beb2a091 (commit)
via 8f29d3b5ae201ae4af368d2221381c5a856913d5 (commit)
via 63e9a36056fe53621fa3001fe22b4833a9ea9457 (commit)
via a3ed3a127ca30b3b25aab0b441f9f3f0ecc07f7e (commit)
from 642c8732a111450a97e4ae41c12a920bc7f02ee0 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=0b0e50ce9efe2fec10e147eddba4f0802235a042
commit 0b0e50ce9efe2fec10e147eddba4f0802235a042
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Oct 25 10:22:12 2013 +0530
Fix stack overflow due to large AF_INET6 requests
Resolves #16072 (CVE-2013-4458).
This patch fixes another stack overflow in getaddrinfo when it is
called with AF_INET6. The AF_UNSPEC case was fixed as CVE-2013-1914,
but the AF_INET6 case went undetected back then.
(cherry picked from commit 7cbcdb3699584db8913ca90f705d6337633ee10f)
Conflicts:
NEWS
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=54377921e7092f709c6a5985688769404637055f
commit 54377921e7092f709c6a5985688769404637055f
Author: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Date: Fri Oct 25 14:25:38 2013 +1000
Fix incorrect getaddrinfo assertion trigger
[BZ #9954]
With the following /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 www.my-domain.es
127.0.1.1 www.my-domain.es
192.168.0.1 www.my-domain.es
Using getaddrinfo() on www.my-domain.es, trigger the following assertion:
../sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c:1473: rfc3484_sort: Assertion
`src->results[i].native == -1 || src->results[i].native == a1_native'
failed.
This is due to two different bugs:
- In rfc3484_sort() rule 7, src->results[i].native is assigned even if
src->results[i].index is -1, meaning that no interface is associated.
- In getaddrinfo() the source IP address used with the lo interface needs a
special case, as it can be any IP within 127.X.Y.Z.
(cherry picked from commit 894f3f1049135dcbeaab8f18690973663ef3147c)
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=9a010a5f6328aa7ba353679e9a9e07465917d6a0
commit 9a010a5f6328aa7ba353679e9a9e07465917d6a0
Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Sep 23 01:44:38 2013 -0400
BZ #15754: Fix test case for ARM.
Statically built binaries use __pointer_chk_guard_local,
while dynamically built binaries use __pointer_chk_guard.
Provide the right definition depending on the test case
we are building.
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=f03cfdf9bf62f776338171fe2ba6eebbf8948875
commit f03cfdf9bf62f776338171fe2ba6eebbf8948875
Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Sep 23 00:52:09 2013 -0400
BZ #15754: CVE-2013-4788
The pointer guard used for pointer mangling was not initialized for
static applications resulting in the security feature being disabled.
The pointer guard is now correctly initialized to a random value for
static applications. Existing static applications need to be
recompiled to take advantage of the fix.
The test tst-ptrguard1-static and tst-ptrguard1 add regression
coverage to ensure the pointer guards are sufficiently random
and initialized to a default value.
Conflicts:
NEWS
ports/ChangeLog.ia64
ports/ChangeLog.tile
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=6957bcb15456b5118c44bb49754b199462336639
commit 6957bcb15456b5118c44bb49754b199462336639
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Sep 23 11:24:30 2013 +0530
Check for integer overflow in cache size computation in strcoll
strcoll is implemented using a cache for indices and weights of
collation sequences in the strings so that subsequent passes do not
have to search through collation data again. For very large string
inputs, the cache size computation could overflow. In such a case,
use the fallback function that does not cache indices and weights of
collation sequences.
Fixes CVE-2012-4412.
(cherry picked from commit 303e567a8062200dc06acde7c76fc34679f08d8f)
Conflicts:
NEWS
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=56532663f2881ce7b7996d75dbb6bbb438187457
commit 56532663f2881ce7b7996d75dbb6bbb438187457
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Sep 23 11:20:02 2013 +0530
Fall back to non-cached sequence traversal and comparison on malloc fail
strcoll currently falls back to alloca if malloc fails, resulting in a
possible stack overflow. This patch implements sequence traversal and
comparison without caching indices and rules.
Fixes CVE-2012-4424.
(cherry picked from commit 141f3a77fe4f1b59b0afa9bf6909cd2000448883)
Conflicts:
NEWS
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=52b8d67f22068991f404c51b38b30e7e35c1bb99
commit 52b8d67f22068991f404c51b38b30e7e35c1bb99
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Aug 20 08:40:05 2013 +0530
Simplify strcoll implementation
Break up strcoll into simpler functions so that the logic is easier to
follow and maintain.
(cherry picked from commit 1326ba1af22068db9488c2328bdaf852b8a93dcf)
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=dc7ba1835ba16cb49d6c38d50e153b70beb2a091
commit dc7ba1835ba16cb49d6c38d50e153b70beb2a091
Author: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
Date: Fri Aug 16 12:54:29 2013 +0100
malloc: Check for integer overflow in memalign.
A large bytes parameter to memalign could cause an integer overflow
and corrupt allocator internals. Check the overflow does not occur
before continuing with the allocation.
ChangeLog:
2013-09-11 Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
[BZ #15857]
* malloc/malloc.c (__libc_memalign): Check the value of bytes
does not overflow.
(cherry picked from commit b73ed247781d533628b681f57257dc85882645d3)
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=8f29d3b5ae201ae4af368d2221381c5a856913d5
commit 8f29d3b5ae201ae4af368d2221381c5a856913d5
Author: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
Date: Fri Aug 16 11:59:37 2013 +0100
malloc: Check for integer overflow in valloc.
A large bytes parameter to valloc could cause an integer overflow
and corrupt allocator internals. Check the overflow does not occur
before continuing with the allocation.
ChangeLog:
2013-09-11 Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
[BZ #15856]
* malloc/malloc.c (__libc_valloc): Check the value of bytes
does not overflow.
(cherry picked from commit 55e17aadc1ef17a1df9626fb0e9fba290ece3331)
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=63e9a36056fe53621fa3001fe22b4833a9ea9457
commit 63e9a36056fe53621fa3001fe22b4833a9ea9457
Author: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
Date: Mon Aug 12 15:08:02 2013 +0100
malloc: Check for integer overflow in pvalloc.
A large bytes parameter to pvalloc could cause an integer overflow
and corrupt allocator internals. Check the overflow does not occur
before continuing with the allocation.
ChangeLog:
2013-09-11 Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
[BZ #15855]
* malloc/malloc.c (__libc_pvalloc): Check the value of bytes
does not overflow.
(cherry picked from commit 1159a193696ad48ec86e5895f6dee3e539619c0e)
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=a3ed3a127ca30b3b25aab0b441f9f3f0ecc07f7e
commit a3ed3a127ca30b3b25aab0b441f9f3f0ecc07f7e
Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Aug 16 09:38:52 2013 +0200
CVE-2013-4237, BZ #14699: Buffer overflow in readdir_r
* sysdeps/posix/dirstream.h (struct __dirstream): Add errcode
member.
* sysdeps/posix/opendir.c (__alloc_dir): Initialize errcode
member.
* sysdeps/posix/rewinddir.c (rewinddir): Reset errcode member.
* sysdeps/posix/readdir_r.c (__READDIR_R): Enforce NAME_MAX limit.
Return delayed error code. Remove GETDENTS_64BIT_ALIGNED
conditional.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64/readdir_r.c: Do not define
GETDENTS_64BIT_ALIGNED.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/readdir64_r.c: Likewise.
* manual/filesys.texi (Reading/Closing Directory): Document
ENAMETOOLONG return value of readdir_r. Recommend readdir more
strongly.
* manual/conf.texi (Limits for Files): Add portability note to
NAME_MAX, PATH_MAX.
(Pathconf): Add portability note for _PC_NAME_MAX, _PC_PATH_MAX.
(cherry picked from commit 91ce40854d0b7f865cf5024ef95a8026b76096f3)
Conflicts:
NEWS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
ChangeLog | 118 +++
csu/libc-start.c | 16 +
elf/Makefile | 12 +-
elf/tst-ptrguard1-static.c | 1 +
elf/tst-ptrguard1.c | 202 +++++
malloc/malloc.c | 21 +
manual/conf.texi | 9 +
manual/filesys.texi | 73 ++-
ports/ChangeLog.ia64 | 5 +
ports/ChangeLog.tile | 5 +
ports/sysdeps/ia64/stackguard-macros.h | 3 +
ports/sysdeps/tile/stackguard-macros.h | 6 +
string/Makefile | 2 +
string/strcoll_l.c | 926 +++++++++++++----------
string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c | 61 ++
sysdeps/generic/stackguard-macros.h | 8 +
sysdeps/i386/stackguard-macros.h | 8 +
sysdeps/posix/dirstream.h | 2 +
sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c | 33 +-
sysdeps/posix/opendir.c | 1 +
sysdeps/posix/readdir_r.c | 42 +-
sysdeps/posix/rewinddir.c | 1 +
sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/stackguard-macros.h | 10 +
sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/stackguard-macros.h | 10 +
sysdeps/s390/s390-32/stackguard-macros.h | 11 +
sysdeps/s390/s390-64/stackguard-macros.h | 14 +
sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/stackguard-macros.h | 3 +
sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/stackguard-macros.h | 3 +
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/readdir64_r.c | 1 -
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64/readdir_r.c | 1 -
sysdeps/x86_64/stackguard-macros.h | 5 +
31 files changed, 1159 insertions(+), 454 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 elf/tst-ptrguard1-static.c
create mode 100644 elf/tst-ptrguard1.c
create mode 100644 string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-25 14:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-16 18:23 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-13 11:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com @ 2014-02-16 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-16 18:23 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
@ 2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
2014-06-13 11:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: schwab at sourceware dot org @ 2014-05-28 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Andreas Schwab <schwab at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug network/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
[not found] <bug-9954-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-28 19:43 ` schwab at sourceware dot org
@ 2014-06-13 11:15 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-13 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-03-15 15:32 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 18:39 ` drepper at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-03-15 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-03-15 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=3822)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3822&action=view)
Patch to fix the problem.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 15:32 ` [Bug libc/9954] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-03-15 18:39 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2009-03-15 20:19 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-15 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2009-03-15 18:39 -------
None of the change should be needed.
None of the known interfaces should have the index -1 and hence the test should
be unnecessary. If this is not the case there is a problem elsewhere and you're
hiding it with the change.
For the deprecated addresses the same, the problem is in the configuration and
you're hiding it.
And no, I cannot reproduce any problem with the information you provide. You
have to be much more detailed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 15:32 ` [Bug libc/9954] " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 18:39 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2009-03-15 20:19 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 20:50 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-03-15 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-03-15 20:19 -------
> None of the known interfaces should have the index -1 and hence the test
> should be unnecessary. If this is not the case there is a problem elsewhere
> and you're hiding it with the change.
Entries in /etc/hosts corresponding to IP 127.X.Y.Z, while being different than
127.0.0.1 are getting index -1, thus triggerring the problem.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-15 20:19 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-03-15 20:50 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 20:51 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-03-15 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-03-15 20:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=3823)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3823&action=view)
testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-15 20:50 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-03-15 20:51 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-03-15 20:52 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-03-15 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-03-15 20:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=3824)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3824&action=view)
/etc/host.conf for testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-15 20:51 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-03-15 20:52 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
2009-07-17 18:14 ` list at phuk dot ath dot cx
2010-06-01 3:44 ` pasky at suse dot cz
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: aurelien at aurel32 dot net @ 2009-03-15 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-03-15 20:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=3825)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3825&action=view)
/etc/hosts for testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-15 20:52 ` aurelien at aurel32 dot net
@ 2009-07-17 18:14 ` list at phuk dot ath dot cx
2010-06-01 3:44 ` pasky at suse dot cz
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: list at phuk dot ath dot cx @ 2009-07-17 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From list at phuk dot ath dot cx 2009-07-17 18:13 -------
I'm also hitting this and it seems to be due to conflicts between /etc/hosts and
DNS. I've removed everything but localhost from /etc/hosts, and now everything
seems fine. However, this "assertion failed" message is very unclear. It's very
hard to find out what's actually causing it because there's not even the
slightest hint of what we are actually talking about. What is src, what's the
meaning of the results field, what is a1_native...?
Providing just a *little* bit of context would greatly ease the debugging of
this. Right now, the only option of getting *some rough* idea of what this
assertion actually means is reading the code, which is obiously very
time-consuming for anyone not familiar glibc internals.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug libc/9954] getaddrinfo assertion triggered without reason
2009-03-15 15:31 [Bug libc/9954] New: " aurelien at aurel32 dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-07-17 18:14 ` list at phuk dot ath dot cx
@ 2010-06-01 3:44 ` pasky at suse dot cz
7 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: pasky at suse dot cz @ 2010-06-01 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-01 03:44:20
date| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread