public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Blaine <>
Subject: What will I dislike about GNATS?
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Coming from the world of Req and having looked into RT and roundup,
what makes GNATS stand out in comparison?  I don't necessarily mean
"What makes GNATS better?"  I am curious to hear of its quirks or
odd modes of workflow if they exist.  I've browsed the docs and

Thanks for any info.

Help-gnats mailing list

             reply	other threads:[~2004-06-09 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-09 18:45 Jeff Blaine [this message]
2004-06-10 10:57 ` Chad Walstrom
2004-06-10 20:24   ` Mel Hatzis
2004-06-10 20:58     ` Yngve Svendsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).