From: Jeff Blaine <jblaine@mitre.org>
To: help-gnats@gnu.org
Subject: What will I dislike about GNATS?
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C72505.9070501@mitre.org> (raw)
Coming from the world of Req and having looked into RT and roundup,
what makes GNATS stand out in comparison? I don't necessarily mean
"What makes GNATS better?" I am curious to hear of its quirks or
odd modes of workflow if they exist. I've browsed the docs and
FAQ.
Thanks for any info.
_______________________________________________
Help-gnats mailing list
Help-gnats@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats
next reply other threads:[~2004-06-09 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-09 18:45 Jeff Blaine [this message]
2004-06-10 10:57 ` Chad Walstrom
2004-06-10 20:24 ` Mel Hatzis
2004-06-10 20:58 ` Yngve Svendsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40C72505.9070501@mitre.org \
--to=jblaine@mitre.org \
--cc=help-gnats@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).