From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30455 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 22:23:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.gnu.org) (199.232.76.165) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 22:23:42 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CX5hG-0007ad-SS for listarch-gnats-devel@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:33:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CX5h9-0007ZG-G9 for help-gnats@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:33:03 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CX5h8-0007YR-DH for help-gnats@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:33:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CX5h7-0007YA-Tw for help-gnats@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:33:01 -0500 Received: from [209.86.89.61] (helo=smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CX5Xg-0003XT-N7 for help-gnats@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:23:16 -0500 Received: from [68.164.86.35] (helo=[192.168.1.3]) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1CX5Xg-0001er-48; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:23:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20041124212912.GA3497@wookimus.net> References: <687D4F29-3E41-11D9-9B0E-000D93336F56@acm.org> <20041124212912.GA3497@wookimus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6C2CFB1A-3E67-11D9-9B0E-000D93336F56@acm.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Pankaj Garg Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:23:00 -0000 To: Chad Walstrom X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-ELNK-Trace: 7705cff7f8fc6ea374bf435c0eb9d478159ca1ffc90cf035c54901858a6f56f10b6ebe12c126cbb3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.164.86.35 Cc: help-gnats@gnu.org Subject: Re: Gnats bug reporting X-BeenThere: help-gnats@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion about GNU GNATS List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: help-gnats-bounces+listarch-gnats-devel=sources.redhat.com@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnats-bounces+listarch-gnats-devel=sources.redhat.com@gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 I'd vote for running the stable version, rather than the cutting edge. On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:29 PM, Chad Walstrom wrote: > .... So, I'll seek your opinions regarding the > "dogbowl" status of our project. Do you think it's more important to > have a stable version of GNATS running for our own bug reporting, or > would you prefer to see a newer, perhaps RC version of GNATS running? > > I'm partial to simply running the stable version rather than cutting > edge. If you all feel we should do cutting edge, I'll compile GNATS > locally on my personal account on fencepost and run it from my home > directory. _______________________________________________ Help-gnats mailing list Help-gnats@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats