From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Milan Zamazal <pdm@zamazal.org>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gnats-devel@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNATS feature requests
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:12:00 -0000
Message-id: <878zl99a9x.fsf@zamazal.org>
References: <200104090921.KAA08222@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q2/msg00021.html

>>>>> "RE" == Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:

    RE> It would also be useful for the canonical PR to contain a
    RE> reference to those PRs that are duplicates, just in case one of
    RE> them happens to have additional pertinent information.  A field
    RE> such as "duplicates: <pr-list>" would do this.

Yes, there should be some way of linking of both the problems (kind of
virtual merge).

Milan Zamazal

-- 
Here is my advice, don't try to program the bleeding edge for the
general populace unless you really, really, really like migraines.
						   Neal H. Walfield