From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <help-gnats-admin@gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23884 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2001 22:11:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2001 22:11:19 -0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 166bFC-0005yW-00; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:33:06 -0500
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.111.12])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 166bEH-0005xc-00
	for <help-gnats@gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:32:09 -0500
Received: from [128.130.111.28] (naos [128.130.111.28])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fALHVuI28574;
	Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:31:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: Yngve Svendsen <yngve.svendsen@clustra.com>
cc: help-gnats@gnu.org, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: gnatsweb PR status change messages
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011120231706.00b72c20@10.10.1.1>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.41.0111211830390.16395-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: help-gnats-admin@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnats-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: help-gnats@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnats-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnats@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats>,
	<mailto:help-gnats-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General discussion about GNU GNATS <help-gnats.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/help-gnats/>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:19:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Yngve Svendsen wrote:
> I added the following Reply-To line to the current version 2 CVS:
> Reply-To: $from, $mailto, $config{'GNATS_ADDR'}
> [...]
> Do you think this solves the problem? I was a bit uncertain whether to put
> the $from in the Reply-To, but I decided that would be the most logical
> thing to do.

Yes, this looks fine.  Joseph, do you agree?

> I'll be kicking out a version 2.9.3 in a few days, just need to put in a
> couple more minor patches first.

Thanks a lot!

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/


_______________________________________________
Help-gnats mailing list
Help-gnats@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats