public inbox for gnu-gabi@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>
To: James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, gnu-gabi@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJimCsFaVCo48abjrZUTOyuyfzfzQatQgaXp2fzE5msjtXA+RA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2zVHqBowJEUjSNQw_867_79_FsSKJLLxf9GQQA+r+fGPToUQ@mail.gmail.com>

> Why is MAP_SHARED even needed for the linux vdso use-case?
>
> All the mappings created for the vdso are read-only mappings, right?
> And on Linux, MAP_PRIVATE mappings already reflect changes made to the
> underlying file, so long as the process hasn't written to the page, I
> think?
>
> So, if you're intending to use this to implement the "vvar" mapping,
> isn't the default MAP_PRIVATE already sufficient?

He mentioned that this was for the kernel-provided *data* page,
implying to me that he wants a writable, but still sharable (i.e., not
copy-on-write) mapping.

It seems generally useful to me. I probably wouldn't object to a new
gABI bit, but a little more background would be helpful in deciding.

-cary

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-08  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-01  0:00 H. Peter Anvin
2017-01-01  0:00 ` James Y Knight via gnu-gabi
2017-01-01  0:00   ` Cary Coutant [this message]
2017-01-01  0:00     ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-01-01  0:00     ` Suprateeka R Hegde
2017-01-01  0:00       ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-01-01  0:00         ` Suprateeka R Hegde
2017-01-01  0:00 ` Cary Coutant
2017-01-01  0:00   ` hpa
2017-01-01  0:00     ` Suprateeka R Hegde
2017-01-01  0:00       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJimCsFaVCo48abjrZUTOyuyfzfzQatQgaXp2fzE5msjtXA+RA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ccoutant@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnu-gabi@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jyknight@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).