From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45264 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2018 05:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gnu-gabi-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: gnu-gabi-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 45205 invoked by uid 89); 12 Dec 2018 05:58:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:531, HX-Gm-Message-State:aEWZ, our X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mail-it1-f196.google.com Received: from mail-it1-f196.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f196.google.com) (209.85.166.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 05:58:43 +0000 Received: by mail-it1-f196.google.com with SMTP id z7so7420954iti.0; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:58:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=f4ay8pW05AuCCFzFu+1MSXokBaTaSLwDZZP6KW8a+ig=; b=S0jGV9GMF6g4GRE/H8KAvB6zGo/MtqppCfWhVUvr1Yiiyg+thKHHVarfsKo3HFjQxc mdVXjNJm1KaVFZAwdCy5aGE122U/2P+r8rr3YcGLgTA4Ad1GucVm/19/jReuJ1ceKTEj GWpzSv7aLhqqn+TFew9m8KlDXX/YhiXseWpNsOjk/FLI0jNGpfzAmNs7mKGJ3yBmeXhc gS+3a4kDfQGYuAOtxbOe0Y7mF8kDFQR5LXNPMTk2FGK8z4LcyqwuBlqyacpO2XhNvLtx KIt8/7b/ijJUWw4XswUE5cQujYvGU82sV7RMLiNSudobrs8Qrh6X0LDGZ+TqDT2EszTp n5kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f4ay8pW05AuCCFzFu+1MSXokBaTaSLwDZZP6KW8a+ig=; b=c6jRAGdLBXTgW0fa9YDednSgLJQG4LVk067vfQ2FMygvutG0Ex47s2yMKBK2je/ZqZ /VXQWxdN7E7LGwi5iM8Ob8ohBrMcCP8r/gsQXxlwL5jPHztqSDUuQ4KjGV9oaOupgeIs RIUqWVkWB9BQKfuRa49Pan8A8O67wYIvpKe0YA+uKBRaID3zQceiF6qBVEMZUC0e6L6b 5edWzm5wIGyGmbO27lPV+5l6Tx3oxj6gsBJ+2NNvVvQZ9N+RLPGKZY9l1Xw80KkQb9d9 T5OguCTxk3CPqv+35Bls1IktInOXnd/k3OAU8scDfJkTLHYeQAlXIidpMWc1TCp5UIWu jFag== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZ/5K1Ra7AU6s7l5AaQ8DW/RINeiPQc2KrI+5WInJ6+fJgJ1sOB Av/3ak6ofLvq+exeNiVhyM9kVMwyWMfv8TX1ltU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XgExafQkigtmRTXMkGvAElIOY7ds8StjFjShqPblaJbWNe56HBnok86eVCw4kzi/MU2vRptU663d6eMa9Bjsk= X-Received: by 2002:a02:4f88:: with SMTP id r8mr18455014jad.69.1544594321623; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:58:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87k1kyhbki.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87zhtcz7cg.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20181211131933.GA9599@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181211131933.GA9599@gmail.com> From: Cary Coutant Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Add PT_GNU_PROPERTY to cover .note.gnu.property section To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Florian Weimer , Binutils , GNU C Library , gnu-gabi@sourceware.org, x86-64-abi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-q4/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 > > I would strongly recommended to try harder to get consensus here. I do > > not want to be a in a situation were we revise ABI again two years from > > now. > > That is my hope. PT_GNU_PROPERTY is our consensus so far. As you might expect, I support this new program header. Ideally, I'd have liked to replace the input SHT_NOTE sections with SHT_GNU_PROPERTY sections and dispense with all the note section overhead, but I'll take this as a compromise. -cary