On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:59 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > According to gABI, each note entry should be aligned to 4 bytes in 32-bit > objects or 8 bytes in 64-bit objects. But Linux has been using 4 byte > alignment for .note.ABI-tag note and .note.gnu.build-id note in 64-bit > objects. We can't change their alignment to 8 bytes. Since all notes i > n one PT_LOAD segment must have the same alignment which equals to p_align. > Note parser can use p_align of PT_LOAD segment for note alignment, instead > of assuming alignment based on ELF file class. > > Here is a patch to Linux Extensions to gABI. I also regenerated PDF > file at > > https://github.com/hjl-tools/linux-abi/wiki/Linux-Extensions-to-gABI > > H.J. > --- > Document difference in alignment of .note.ABI-tag and .note.gnu.build-id > sections from gABI. > --- > object-files.tex | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/object-files.tex b/object-files.tex > index 64ce243..5b7b414 100644 > --- a/object-files.tex > +++ b/object-files.tex > @@ -518,6 +518,18 @@ identify OS and version targeted. It can be merged with other > signifies a 2.2.5 kernel. > \end{description} > > +\subsection{Alignment of Note Sections} > + > +All entries in a \texttt{PT_LOAD} segment have the same alignment which ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Typo. It should PT_NOTE. > +equals to the {\tt p_align} field in program header. > + > +According to gABI, each note entry should be aligned to 4 bytes in > +32-bit objects or 8 bytes in 64-bit objects. But \code{.note.ABI-tag} > +section (see Section~\ref{sec_abi_tag}) and \code{.note.gnu.build-id} > +section (see Section~\ref{sec_build_id}) are aligned to 4 bytes in > +both 32-bit and 64-bit objects. Note parser should use {\tt p_align} > +for note alignment, instead of assuming alignment based on ELF file class. > + > \section{Symbol Table} > > \begin{table}[H] Here is the updated patch. -- H.J.