From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F26F3857021 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:42:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6F26F3857021 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=matz@suse.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9518AAD08; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:42:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Michael Matz To: Jozef Lawrynowicz cc: gnu-gabi@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] SHF_GNU_RETAIN ELF Section Flag In-Reply-To: <877dsr0xbo.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <95e4fd3d-1486-b700-29b0-8b126b24d0ca@redhat.com> <875z8dn9xj.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20200916141345.wxae5ytkyybbpcec@jozef-acer-manjaro> <20200918100046.r4c3qepxbccp7poc@jozef-acer-manjaro> <877dsr0xbo.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gnu-gabi@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnu-gabi mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:42:57 -0000 Hello, On Fri, 18 Sep 2020, Florian Weimer via Gnu-gabi wrote: > * Jozef Lawrynowicz: > > > Unless we are trying to be protective of the remaining operating > > system-specific section flag bits, I don't really see any downside to > > going the route of SHF_GNU_RETAIN. It is very simple, the linker > > implementation requires only one additional line of code, and the > > definition precisely describes how the section should be treated. > > > > SHF_GNU_RETAIN > > The link editor should not garbage collect the section if it is > > unused. > > I don't have any objections to this wording. Me neither. Ciao, Michael.