From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78833 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2018 12:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gnu-gabi-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: gnu-gabi-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 78809 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2018 12:32:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.1 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:32:36 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E19FB0A9; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 -0000 From: Michael Matz To: Florian Weimer cc: "H.J. Lu" , Szabolcs Nagy , Jan Beulich , Rich Felker , Binutils , gnu-gabi@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Add SHT_GNU_PHDRS In-Reply-To: <87r2hfqes1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <87tvmbv8hp.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <5BAC7D6802000078001EC6D1@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <87pnwzuz8r.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20180927103539.GJ10209@port70.net> <87va6rqfg6.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87r2hfqes1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-q3/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Hi, On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'm now under the impression that the bits that are PT_LOAD'ed all need > to be covered by (allocated) sections. That is wrong. Szabolcs is reading too much into some careless wording of the ELF text that simply tries to convey the idea that usually segments contents are the result of some sections combined by the link editor. Sections are purely optional in the execution view. This section hack isn't necessary at all for what we need. The link editor merely needs to ensure that the program headers are part of some loadable segment, either by placing it not at the start of the file (though that would mean the ELF header isn't part of the loaded image, which is desirable to have), or by creating such loadble segment if necessary. No gABI extensions are needed. Ciao, Michael.