From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53413857C52 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:17:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A53413857C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mark@klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (tarox.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25F35302BB21; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D10B74708672; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: ABI document From: Mark Wielaard To: Vivek Das Mohapatra Cc: Florian Weimer , GNU gABI gnu-gabi Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:17:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <87o8nypmpq.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <616c0f661732fd1021e5a5b13ef872927390004d.camel@klomp.org> <87ime6pl2q.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <1597402688538.b66a61e7629438@mozgaia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-8.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gnu-gabi@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnu-gabi mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:17:54 -0000 Hi, On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 12:33 +0100, Vivek Das Mohapatra via Gnu-gabi wrote: > > The GNU Gabi now has a git backed website to document these things > >=20 > > https://sourceware.org/gnu-gabi >=20 > Nice: Any particular preferred format? Lets stick to plain text for now. Just so we have something that can simply be converted into anything. Best to start with content before worrying about format IMHO. There are some other gABI extensions that use LaTeX, so we could adopt that to reuse some structure. But personally I would prefer some simpler markup language like StructuredText (rst) or MarkDown (md). I believe Cary was converting the actual gABI spec into MarkDown. Cheers, Mark