From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36992 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2019 15:39:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gnu-gabi-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: gnu-gabi-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 36970 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2019 15:39:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:24c0c8d, H*f:sk:mvm5zux, H*i:sk:c0e26c8, H*f:sk:c0e26c8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 15:39:50 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62751AFD9; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:39:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Schwab To: Nick Clifton Cc: "binutils\@sourceware.org" , ruiu@google.com, peter.smith@linaro.org, sguelton@redhat.com, gnu-gabi@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC Adding a section group flag of 0 References: <24c0c8d8-44e6-ab81-bdfb-43af8b53323b@redhat.com> X-Yow: I'm continually AMAZED at th'breathtaking effects of WIND EROSION!! Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Nick Clifton's message of "Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:29:25 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Jan 09 2019, Nick Clifton wrote: > The problem is that this does not make it clear whether a value > of zero is allowed or an error. Why would the absence of flag 0 be different from the absence of any other flag? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."