From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gnutools-advocacy-return-11-listarch-gnutools-advocacy=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 79147 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2018 17:37:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gnutools-advocacy-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gnutools-advocacy@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gnutools-advocacy-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gnutools-advocacy-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gnutools-advocacy-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79134 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2018 17:37:03 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.1 on sourceware.org
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=marketing, companies, click, Marketing
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-HELO: mail-io1-f52.google.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=systemhalted.org; s=google;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=e2GfIXxaeE2eBZKqdgMxga0GP2gfHH2CpcTkjE8JCdM=;
        b=Mw0Y/aTOrJ5EDlrSktUYvp2fTjxpgINteiTyE0HWotQ5fmp5v/Q8OQDjx8NaOoay+0
         WRu5HTCFTUGVk4P+GNSZqTi3Z/l3JcOz9D+SHNnLZyjcP8P+qsc5tSslLN43lURdTEWq
         zvAneReFU0nxnT/V4Ozaaq47dAPNvY0bhZeZ4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=e2GfIXxaeE2eBZKqdgMxga0GP2gfHH2CpcTkjE8JCdM=;
        b=rMGi0tVIwnunHzHvVoVbdDtu51r4uNXtNJgek2KZmaVa0pl4cvjmR6zhRqErm9VW6M
         YtkTuuGxXPYJOvzz9jkHEpXaPgyelV0Yjh1IWWjbQ+/43wy+XncJePhcMJkhSApLsZrm
         hDryPcX7hwR77B37MgLg8ZRMu5GF8bw2iURb8BfHhTYbJ0O3X587RTnuraiRsa0ftUsM
         3Nxbepjbpi2B7wYDrpQ3eecy5kPIY7jr4UsZ63zkIUPljSbRn5NRbaYSqDVzauqK+sX6
         seSH///SUpwvYB1s6oAaAtR0WmcEW04CRqc8fY2ImRwWeg1weVpVy0qfRzH0mUup2txz
         UqgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoi/CkgxaHbSbGRDUDZ2RhSJ4VEfMB5Une6RgbMfwZCbmTsruGbF
	VOHU+OXJcFzngdSaOS1c/SxV0utlWzr0qPDK0YkIIA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV6238Z9rfiKeTSgTKNG2aF9FdQx7G+KYg/hMEiocFHOvgqMDAqKdnsfYwD5NCIG6xJiaqXQhOWBjF6QLmnye3J0=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7417:: with SMTP id s23-v6mr8935565iog.243.1538761020182;
 Fri, 05 Oct 2018 10:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <29850D75-B7F9-41FA-8E38-B8B4915D36BC@gmail.com>
 <CAE2sS1hFuv1dhxuaS8AhoX97bBYA_XVHMM2fSEmg=crqvE3A6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvnyn9R3PdHYe6NcYwYvNALBPw6pc2DZHG31sfzj+yMwFQWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvnynBRm06NsPLnu101i6V8dDYZqh_bVe5W7NXzf0sjcEXgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE2sS1gj2MkbN16g5XCGPMtzvfnq04yw1u-SPU_tsfXBVTYhMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGWvnym4w1HgmBe0kCsnMuvx4JoaU-OcaPkiG3tj0Tr6qNN3eQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvnym4w1HgmBe0kCsnMuvx4JoaU-OcaPkiG3tj0Tr6qNN3eQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAE2sS1hW0gBXNJ6q4oCnScH75YoADsZ9QP_jz1Mp7RhACXMGSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GNU toolchain web page
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: iains.gcc@gmail.com, gnutools-advocacy@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2018-q4/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2

I'd rather see a consistent use and clear developer naming.

e.g.
dev.gnutools.org / dev.gnu.tools / dev.gnutoolchain.org = Developer
landing page.
www.gnutools.org / www.gnu.tools / www.gnutoolchain.org = Marketing
landing page.

Thoughts?


On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 1:33 PM David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We also have registered gnutools.org and gnutoolchain.org.
>
> Maybe gnutools.org for dev and gnutoolchain.org for marketing.
>
> - David
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 1:27 PM Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:16 AM David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I propose that we want to target two different audiences and, as a
> > > stretch goal, want two distinct web sites.
> > >
> > > 1) A focal point for users and developers to access information.
> > >
> > > 2) A marketing landing page with testimonials, like a startup
> > > e-commerce landing page.
> > >
> > > They can be combined, but each has a different style and feel.
> >
> > A high level marketing landing page with slick graphics feels like it
> > should be the first thing you see.
> >
> > Followed by a  "developer" button for developers to jump into a sub-page.
> >
> > However... some companies split this in two.
> >
> > See for example:
> >
> > https://www.wix.com/
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > https://dev.wix.com/
> >
> > There is almost no overlap between the two sites. You have to scroll
> > to the very bottom of the first page and click "Developers" under
> > "Product" get to dev.wix.com, *but* Google searches can take you
> > directly to dev.wix.com.
> >
> > We have registered gnu.tools, so we could also use dev.gnu.tools to
> > take you to a developer facing page vs. www.gnu.tools which takes you
> > to a marketing landing page?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Carlos.