From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19722 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2003 20:07:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19714 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2003 20:07:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.jazzfree.com) (62.151.11.91) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2003 20:07:49 -0000 Received: from [62.151.92.62] (helo=HOME) by smtp.jazzfree.com with smtp id 1Ab3fl-0001bf-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:07:29 +0100 Message-ID: <000501c3ce48$0088ac30$3e5c973e@HOME> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S.Calder=F3n?= To: "Przemyslaw Sliwa" , References: <23386.160.83.32.14.1072701383.squirrel@webmail.euv-frankfurt-o.de> Subject: Re: Did *anyone* actually build GSL under Visual Studio? Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:07:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 Hello, I was trying to build the libraries with C++ Borland Builder without succes. Nevertheless when the *.h files and the dll for Visual C++ was accessible to everybody was not difficult to work with. Please, could you help me also? Regards. S.Calderon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Przemyslaw Sliwa" To: Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 1:36 PM Subject: Re: Did *anyone* actually build GSL under Visual Studio? > I did it last night, > > It was not very difficult. After reading the HACKING file I have got the > impression the author didn't want to explain in details how to build the > libraries. But I have managed it. Perhaps he wanted to get some money for > the consultation :) > > Write me an email, I will explai it to you. > > Best > > Przem > > >