From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2643 invoked by alias); 21 May 2002 06:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2634 invoked from network); 21 May 2002 06:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO facstaff.wesleyan.edu) (129.133.1.61) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2002 06:03:37 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by facstaff.wesleyan.edu (8.11.2/8.10.2) id g4L63aZ24405 for gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 21 May 2002 02:03:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: facstaff.wesleyan.edu: nobody set sender to jdwright@wesleyan.edu using -f To: Subject: gsl_sf_coupling_3j Message-ID: <1021961016.3ce9e3388be05@mail.wesleyan.edu> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:55:00 -0000 From: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.0-pre13 X-SW-Source: 2002/txt/msg00552.txt.bz2 Dear gsl users, Does anyone out there have experience using the "gsl_sf_coupling_3j" routine of the "gsl_sf_coupling" package? I wonder if the call: gsl_sf_coupling_3j (two_ja,two_jb,two_jc,two_ma,two_mb,two_mc) yields accurate results for large values of two_ja, two_jb, and two_jc around 30 with two_ma=0,two_mb=0,two_mc=0. Thanks, J. David Wright Physics Department Wesleyan University jdwright@wesleyan.edu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2643 invoked by alias); 21 May 2002 06:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2634 invoked from network); 21 May 2002 06:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO facstaff.wesleyan.edu) (129.133.1.61) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2002 06:03:37 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by facstaff.wesleyan.edu (8.11.2/8.10.2) id g4L63aZ24405 for gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 21 May 2002 02:03:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: facstaff.wesleyan.edu: nobody set sender to jdwright@wesleyan.edu using -f To: Subject: gsl_sf_coupling_3j Message-ID: <1021961016.3ce9e3388be05@mail.wesleyan.edu> Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 07:39:00 -0000 From: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.0-pre13 X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20020521073900.bSWd3i0jBtvP489Tjw9CILiQ3eVUxFjVi2Kp-wcINGc@z> Dear gsl users, Does anyone out there have experience using the "gsl_sf_coupling_3j" routine of the "gsl_sf_coupling" package? I wonder if the call: gsl_sf_coupling_3j (two_ja,two_jb,two_jc,two_ma,two_mb,two_mc) yields accurate results for large values of two_ja, two_jb, and two_jc around 30 with two_ma=0,two_mb=0,two_mc=0. Thanks, J. David Wright Physics Department Wesleyan University jdwright@wesleyan.edu