public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alxneit-Kamber Ivo" <ivo.alxneit@psi.ch>
To: <gsl-discuss@sourceware.org>
Subject: RFC bit_vectors
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211361194.31910.9.camel@pc6411.psi.ch> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]

Hi everybody,

attached please find an implementation of 'bit_vectors' (maybe bit
fields would be a better name) that might be an interesting addition to
GSL. 'bit_vectors' can be used similarly like a C bit field, only that
they grow and shrink dynamically depending on the number of bits in use.
Currently the user is limited to 'maximum(size_t)' bits (the bit number
is passed as size_t) or by the amount of memory available. Note,
however, that memory for all bits does not necessarily need to be
allocated because high bits that are either all 1 or 0 are stored as a
single implied bit.

I have implemented the following
	basic functions: init / free / set bit / clear bit / test bit
	utility functions: copy / print / fread / fwrite
	bit wise logical operators: and / or / xor / not
	shift operator: generic / left shift / right shift

'test.c' illustrates the use of bit_vectors. It is not intended to be a
strict verification er test of the code.

I am aware that one of the design criteria of GSL, using a preallocated
workspace instead of performing deep-allocations, is (deliberately)
violated. I thinks that this makes sense here. bit_vectors are, per
definition, infinitely long (within practical limits) and are intended
for situations where the user has no a-priory knowledge of how many
bits will be needed. Under normal circumstances (a few thousands bits
needed) allocation should never fail.

Comments, critisism wellcome.


regards
-- 
Dr. Ivo Alxneit
Laboratory for Solar Technology   phone: +41 56 310 4092
Paul Scherrer Institute             fax: +41 56 310 2688
CH-5232 Villigen                   http://solar.web.psi.ch
Switzerland                   gnupg key: 0x515E30C7

[-- Attachment #1.2: bit_vector.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-compressed-tar, Size: 5962 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2008-05-21  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-21  9:13 Alxneit-Kamber Ivo [this message]
2008-05-22  8:02 ` Brian Gough
2008-05-22 11:34   ` Ivo Alxneit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1211361194.31910.9.camel@pc6411.psi.ch \
    --to=ivo.alxneit@psi.ch \
    --cc=gsl-discuss@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).