From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8577 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2010 01:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 8531 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2010 01:50:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from proofpoint1.lanl.gov (HELO proofpoint1.lanl.gov) (204.121.3.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:50:01 +0000 Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by proofpoint1.lanl.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1O1nwT3003691 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:49:59 -0700 Received: from alvie-mail.lanl.gov (alvie-mail.lanl.gov [128.165.4.110]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE11815FC037 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:49:58 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alvie-mail.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC01C7D0054 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:49:58 -0700 (MST) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at alvie-mail.lanl.gov Received: from [130.55.124.157] (manticore.lanl.gov [130.55.124.157]) by alvie-mail.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B547D0050 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:49:58 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: Feedback from GSL folks on libflame 4.0 From: Gerard Jungman To: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <4a00655d1002171047t4e87fb85w88b609245e3f9a8e@mail.gmail.com> <4B7D90B5.4020707@cs.utexas.edu> <87y6ipozqi.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <1266613086.27033.124.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> <87aav0kit7.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> <4B83B2FC.7000502@sophia.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:50:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1266976300.27033.170.camel@manticore.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-02-24_02:2010-02-06,2010-02-24,2010-02-23 signatures=0 Mailing-List: contact gsl-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gsl-discuss-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 09:54 -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > > I don't suppose they provide an "autotools2cmake" utility, do they? KDE used something of this type, I think its called "am2cmake"; you can google it up. But, as somebody told me recently, it's hard to turn the soup back into vegetables. -- G. Jungman