* FFT
@ 2000-04-07 15:44 David Roundy
2000-04-08 6:43 ` FFT Brian Gough
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Roundy @ 2000-04-07 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gsl-discuss
I was just curious whether you had considered using FFTW for your FFT
routines. It is awfully nice, and very fast, and just so happens to be
covered by the GPL.
--
David Roundy
http://civet.berkeley.edu/droundy/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: FFT
2000-04-07 15:44 FFT David Roundy
@ 2000-04-08 6:43 ` Brian Gough
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gough @ 2000-04-08 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Roundy; +Cc: gsl-discuss
Yes, for serious work we recommend using FFTW, installed as a separate
package. As an explanation, the fft routines in GSL were written
before FFTW was available.
David Roundy writes:
> I was just curious whether you had considered using FFTW for your FFT
> routines. It is awfully nice, and very fast, and just so happens to be
> covered by the GPL.
> --
> David Roundy
> http://civet.berkeley.edu/droundy/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-04-08 6:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-04-07 15:44 FFT David Roundy
2000-04-08 6:43 ` FFT Brian Gough
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).